Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27257956›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Comparative Activity of Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin and Moxifloxacin against Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Assessed by Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations and Time-Kill Studies.

Antoine Grillon, Frédéric Schramm, Magali Kleinberg, François Jehl

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparison of ciprofloxacin, cotrimoxazole, and doxycycline onAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022
    Article
  11. Effect of Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin, and Ofloxacin onAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. OvercomingOpen forum infectious diseases · 2022
    Review
  16. Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Versus Levofloxacin forOpen forum infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antimicrobial Treatment Strategies forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antoine GrillonInstitute of Bacteriology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Strasbourg and Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
Frédéric SchrammInstitute of Bacteriology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Strasbourg and Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
Magali KleinbergInstitute of Bacteriology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Strasbourg and Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
François JehlInstitute of Bacteriology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Strasbourg and Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the in vitro susceptibility of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia to three fluoroquinolones. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin were examined by E-test® for a total of 40 K. pneumoniae strains, 40 S. maltophilia strains and 40 P. aeruginosa strains. Then, the bactericidal activity of these fluoroquinolones was investigated on five strains of each bacterial species by means of time-kill curves. For K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa, the distance of the measured MIC from the clinical break-point is a good indicator of the bactericidal activity for ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin as obtained in our experiments. The lower the MIC, the better the bactericidal activity in term of CFU Log decreases. If MIC of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin against the considered bacteria are far from clinical breakpoint, these two antibiotics are equivalent. According to our MIC50 and modal MIC, the breakpoints of both ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin seem to be somewhat high and data suggest reducing them. On S. maltophilia, none of the tested antibiotics showed a satisfactory activity.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinFluoroquinolonesInhibitory Concentration 50Klebsiella pneumoniaeLevofloxacinMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMoxifloxacinPseudomonas aeruginosaStenotrophomonas maltophiliaAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinFluoroquinolonesLevofloxacinMoxifloxacin

Identifiers

PMID27257956
PMCPMC4892626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.