Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27257916›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2016

Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Bowel Preparation on Adenoma Detection: Early Adenomas Affected Stronger than Advanced Adenomas.

Michael C Sulz, Arne Kröger, Meher Prakash, Christine N Manser, Henriette Heinrich, Benjamin Misselwitz

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 63 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04482452 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Percentage Visualized Mucosa as a Marker for the Quality of Colonoscopy

TypeobservationalSponsorInsel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernRan2020 to 2022Enrolled500ConditionsColonoscopyArmsColonoscopy
NCT07668778 phase3not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of a Modified Bowel Preparation Regimen in Cirrhotic Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy: a Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital do Divino Espírito Santo de Ponta DelgadaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled252ConditionsCirrhosis, Bowel PreparationArms2-L PEG plus bisacodyl plus 3-day low fibre diet, 2-L PEG plus 1-day low fibre diet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Oral sulfate solution benefits polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Prevalence of missed lesions in patients with inadequate bowel preparation through a very early repeat colonoscopy.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2022
    Trial
  8. Can a 1-day clear liquid diet with a split -dose polyethylene glycol overcome conventional practice patterns during the preparation for screening colonoscopy?The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2019
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Combating Post-colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer: Insight from the Trials and Cohort Studies.The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael C SulzDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Arne KrögerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9470-1232
Meher PrakashDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christine N ManserDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Henriette HeinrichDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Benjamin MisselwitzDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsLow-quality bowel preparation reduces efficacy of colonoscopy. We aimed to summarize effects of bowel preparation on detection of adenomas, advanced adenomas and colorectal cancer.

methodsA systematic literature search was performed regarding detection of colonic lesions after normal and low-quality bowel preparation. Reported bowel preparation quality was transformed to the Aronchick scale with its qualities "excellent", "good", "fair", "poor", and "insufficient" or "optimal" (good/excellent), "suboptimal" (fair/poor/insufficient), "adequate" (good/excellent/fair) and "inadequate" (poor/insufficient). We identified two types of studies: i) Comparative studies, directly comparing lesion detection according to bowel preparation quality, and ii) repeat colonoscopy studies, reporting results of a second colonoscopy after previous low-quality preparation.

resultsThe detection of early adenomas was reduced with inadequate vs. adequate bowel preparation (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.53, CI: 0.46-0.62, p<0.001). The advanced adenomas were affected less in comparison (0.74, CI: 0.62-0.87, p<0.001). The large number of subjects considered in the present meta-analysis resulted in smaller confidence intervals compared to earlier studies. Classifying the bowel-preparation quality as suboptimal vs. optimal led to the same qualitative conclusion (OR: 0.81, CI: 0.74-0.89, p<0.001 for early adenomas, OR: 0.94, CI: 0.87-1.01, n.s. for advanced adenomas). Bowel preparation was equally important for right-sided/ flat/ serrated vs. other lesions in most observational studies but more relevant in some repeat colonoscopy studies; data regarding carcinoma detection were insufficient.

conclusionInadequate bowel preparation affects detection of early colonic lesions stronger than advanced lesions.

Indexed as

AdenomaCatharticsColonic NeoplasmsColonoscopyEarly Detection of CancerHumansCathartics

Identifiers

PMID27257916
PMCPMC4892520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.