Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27257864›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Measurement of Electroretinograms and Visually Evoked Potentials in Awake Moving Mice.

Yusuke Tomiyama, Kosuke Fujita, Koji M Nishiguchi, Naoyuki Tokashiki, Reiko Daigaku, Kitako Tabata, Eriko Sugano, Hiroshi Tomita, Toru Nakazawa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Failed remyelination of the nonhuman primate optic nerve leads to axon degeneration, retinal damages, and visual dysfunction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Comparisons of α2-Adrenergic Agents, Medetomidine and Xylazine, with Pentobarbital for Anesthesia: Important Pitfalls in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Rats.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yusuke TomiyamaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kosuke FujitaDepartment of Retinal Disease Control, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Koji M NishiguchiDepartment of Advanced Ophthalmic Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Naoyuki TokashikiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Reiko DaigakuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kitako TabataLaboratory of Visual Neuroscience, Department of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Iwate University, Morioka, Japan.
Eriko SuganoLaboratory of Visual Neuroscience, Department of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Iwate University, Morioka, Japan.
Hiroshi TomitaLaboratory of Visual Neuroscience, Department of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Iwate University, Morioka, Japan.
Toru NakazawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Tohoku University · JPIwate University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of new treatments for intractable retinal diseases requires reliable functional assessment tools for animal models. In vivo measurements of neural activity within visual pathways, including electroretinogram (ERG) and visually evoked potential (VEP) recordings, are commonly used for such purposes. In mice, the ERG and VEPs are usually recorded under general anesthesia, a state that may alter sensory transduction and neurotransmission, but seldom in awake freely moving mice. Therefore, it remains unknown whether the electrophysiological assessment of anesthetized mice accurately reflects the physiological function of the visual pathway. Herein, we describe a novel method to record the ERG and VEPs simultaneously in freely moving mice by immobilizing the head using a custom-built restraining device and placing a rotatable cylinder underneath to allow free running or walking during recording. Injection of the commonly used anesthetic mixture xylazine plus ketamine increased and delayed ERG oscillatory potentials by an average of 67.5% and 36.3%, respectively, compared to unanesthetized mice, while having minimal effects on the a-wave and b-wave. Similarly, components of the VEP were enhanced and delayed by up to 300.2% and 39.3%, respectively, in anesthetized mice. Our method for electrophysiological recording in conscious mice is a sensitive and robust means to assess visual function. It uses a conventional electrophysiological recording system and a simple platform that can be built in any laboratory at low cost. Measurements using this method provide objective indices of mouse visual function with high precision and stability, unaffected by anesthetics.

Indexed as

ElectroretinographyAnestheticsAnimalsEvoked Potentials, VisualMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMovementReproducibility of ResultsWakefulnessAnesthetics

Identifiers

PMID27257864
PMCPMC4892628
OpenAlexW2411672778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.