Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27257810›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Effects of Land Cover on the Movement of Frugivorous Birds in a Heterogeneous Landscape.

Natalia Stefanini Da Silveira, Bernardo Brandão S Niebuhr, Renata de Lara Muylaert, Milton Cezar Ribeiro, Marco Aurélio Pizo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mobile species' responses to surrounding land use generate trade-offs and synergies among nature's contributions to people.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Trophic niche similarities of sympatricEcology and evolution · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The evolutionary origins of Lévy walk foraging.PLoS computational biology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natalia Stefanini Da SilveiraDepartament of Ecology, Spatial Ecology and Conservation Lab, Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bernardo Brandão S NiebuhrDepartament of Ecology, Spatial Ecology and Conservation Lab, Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renata de Lara MuylaertDepartament of Ecology, Spatial Ecology and Conservation Lab, Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.
Milton Cezar RibeiroDepartament of Ecology, Spatial Ecology and Conservation Lab, Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marco Aurélio PizoDepartament of Zoology, Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Movement is a key spatiotemporal process that enables interactions between animals and other elements of nature. The understanding of animal trajectories and the mechanisms that influence them at the landscape level can yield insight into ecological processes and potential solutions to specific ecological problems. Based upon optimal foraging models and empirical evidence, we hypothesized that movement by thrushes is highly tortuous (low average movement speeds and homogeneous distribution of turning angles) inside forests, moderately tortuous in urban areas, which present intermediary levels of resources, and minimally tortuous (high movement speeds and turning angles next to 0 radians) in open matrix types (e.g., crops and pasture). We used data on the trajectories of two common thrush species (Turdus rufiventris and Turdus leucomelas) collected by radio telemetry in a fragmented region in Brazil. Using a maximum likelihood model selection approach we fit four probability distribution models to average speed data, considering short-tailed, long-tailed, and scale-free distributions (to represent different regimes of movement variation), and one distribution to relative angle data. Models included land cover type and distance from forest-matrix edges as explanatory variables. Speed was greater farther away from forest edges and increased faster inside forest habitat compared to urban and open matrices. However, turning angle was not influenced by land cover. Thrushes presented a very tortuous trajectory, with many displacements followed by turns near 180 degrees. Thrush trajectories resembled habitat and edge dependent, tortuous random walks, with a well-defined movement scale inside each land cover type. Although thrushes are habitat generalists, they showed a greater preference for forest edges, and thus may be considered edge specialists. Our results reinforce the importance of studying animal movement patterns in order to understand ecological processes such as seed dispersal in fragmented areas, where the percentage of remaining habitat is dwindling.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemAlgorithmsAnimalsBiodiversityBrazilCitiesFemaleForestsGeographyLikelihood FunctionsMaleMovementProbabilitySeed DispersalSongbirds

Identifiers

PMID27257810
PMCPMC4892584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.