Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27257508›Full record

ReviewBiomaterials research2016

Biomimetic microenvironments for regenerative endodontics.

Sagar N Kaushik, Bogeun Kim, Alexander M Cruz Walma, Sung Chul Choi, Hui Wu, Jeremy J Mao, Ho-Wook Jun, Kyounga Cheon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomaterials research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Regenerative Endodontic Procedures: An Umbrella Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Bilayer gelatin-methacryloyl scaffold for pulp inflammation suppression and dentin-like tissue regeneration.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sagar N KaushikDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
Bogeun KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
Alexander M Cruz WalmaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
Sung Chul ChoiDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea.
Hui WuDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, SDB 311, 1720 2nd Ave South, Birmingham, AL 35294-0007 USA.
Jeremy J MaoCenter for Craniofacial Regeneration at Columbia University, New York City, NY USA.
Ho-Wook JunDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
Kyounga CheonDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, SDB 311, 1720 2nd Ave South, Birmingham, AL 35294-0007 USA.

Funding

Prohealing multifunctional endothelium nanomatrix coated stentR01HL125391 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI JUN, HO-WOOK · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
NITRIC OXIDE RELEASING BIOMIMETRIC NANOMATRIX GELF OR ROOT REVITALIZATIONK08DE027401 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CHEON, KYOUNGA · 2017 to 2022
$798k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL125391NIDCR NIH HHS K08 DE027401NIDCR NIH HHS L30 DE023672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regenerative endodontics has been proposed to replace damaged and underdeveloped tooth structures with normal pulp-dentin tissue by providing a natural extracellular matrix (ECM) mimicking environment; stem cells, signaling molecules, and scaffolds. In addition, clinical success of the regenerative endodontic treatments can be evidenced by absence of signs and symptoms; no bony pathology, a disinfected pulp, and the maturation of root dentin in length and thickness. In spite of the various approaches of regenerative endodontics, there are several major challenges that remain to be improved: a) the endodontic root canal is a strong harbor of the endodontic bacterial biofilm and the fundamental etiologic factors of recurrent endodontic diseases, (b) tooth discolorations are caused by antibiotics and filling materials, (c) cervical root fractures are caused by endodontic medicaments, (d) pulp tissue is not vascularized nor innervated, and (e) the dentin matrix is not developed with adequate root thickness and length. Generally, current clinical protocols and recent studies have shown a limited success of the pulp-dentin tissue regeneration. Throughout the various approaches, the construction of biomimetic microenvironments of pulp-dentin tissue is a key concept of the tissue engineering based regenerative endodontics. The biomimetic microenvironments are composed of a synthetic nano-scaled polymeric fiber structure that mimics native pulp ECM and functions as a scaffold of the pulp-dentin tissue complex. They will provide a framework of the pulp ECM, can deliver selective bioactive molecules, and may recruit pluripotent stem cells from the vicinity of the pulp apex. The polymeric nanofibers are produced by methods of self-assembly, electrospinning, and phase separation. In order to be applied to biomedical use, the polymeric nanofibers require biocompatibility, stability, and biodegradability. Therefore, this review focuses on the development and application of the biomimetic microenvironments of pulp-dentin tissue among the current regenerative endodontics.

Indexed as

Biomimetic microenvironmentsExtracellular matrixPulp-dentin tissueRegenerative endodonticsRevascularizationTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID27257508
PMCPMC4890532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.