Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27257377›Full record

Observational studyClinical interventions in aging2016

Switching to low-dose oral prolonged-release oxycodone/naloxone from WHO-Step I drugs in elderly patients with chronic pain at high risk of early opioid discontinuation.

Marzia Lazzari, Claudio Marcassa, Silvia Natoli, Roberta Carpenedo, Clarissa Caldarulo, Maria B Silvi, Mario Dauri

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical interventions in aging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Opioid Prescribing in the Elderly: A Systematic Review.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2020
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marzia LazzariDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Pain Medicine and Anaesthesiology, Tor Vergata Polyclinic, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Claudio MarcassaCardiology Division, Fondazione Maugeri IRCCS Veruno, Novara, Italy.
Silvia NatoliDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Pain Medicine and Anaesthesiology, Tor Vergata Polyclinic, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Roberta CarpenedoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Pain Medicine and Anaesthesiology, Tor Vergata Polyclinic, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Clarissa CaldaruloDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Pain Medicine and Anaesthesiology, Tor Vergata Polyclinic, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Maria B SilviDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Pain Medicine and Anaesthesiology, Tor Vergata Polyclinic, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Mario DauriDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Pain Medicine and Anaesthesiology, Tor Vergata Polyclinic, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Policlinico Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChronic pain has a high prevalence in the aging population. Strong opioids also should be considered in older people for the treatment of moderate to severe pain or for pain that impairs functioning and the quality of life. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the direct switch to low-dose strong opioids (World Health Organization-Step III drugs) in elderly, opioid-naive patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis was a single-center, retrospective, observational study in opioid-naive patients aged ≥75 years, with moderate to severe chronic pain (>6-month duration) and constipation, who initiated treatment with prolonged-release oxycodone/naloxone (OXN-PR). Patients were re-evaluated after 15, 30, and 60 days (T60, final observation). Response to treatment was defined as an improvement in pain of ≥30% after 30 days of therapy without worsening of constipation.

resultsOne-hundred and eighty-six patients (mean ± SD age 80.7±4.7 years; 64.5% women) with severe chronic pain (mean average pain intensity 7.1±1.0 on the 11-point numerical rating scale) and constipation (mean Bowel Function Index 64.1±24.4; 89.2% of patients on laxatives) were initiated treatment with OXN-PR (mean daily dose 11.3±3.5 mg). OXN-PR reduced pain intensity rapidly and was well tolerated; 63.4% of patients responded to treatment with OXN-PR. At T60 (mean daily OXN-PR dose, 21.5±9.7 mg), the pain intensity was reduced by 66.7%. In addition, bowel function improved (mean decrease of Bowel Function Index from baseline to T60, -28.2, P<0.0001) and the use of laxatives decreased. Already after 15 days and throughout treatment, ~70% of patients perceived their status as much/extremely improved. Only 1.6% of patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events.

conclusionLow-dose OXN-PR in elderly patients naive to opioids proved to be an effective option for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic pain. Large-scale trials are needed to improve clinical guidance in the assessment and treatment of pain in older people.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesics, OpioidChronic PainConstipationDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansItalyMaleNaloxoneOxycodonePain MeasurementQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug CombinationsNaloxoneOxycodonechronic painelderlynaloxoneopioidoxycodone

Identifiers

PMID27257377
PMCPMC4874636
OpenAlexW2371213451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.