Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27257092›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2016

Treatment Preferences for Active Surveillance versus Active Treatment among Men with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Kathryn L Taylor, Richard M Hoffman, Kimberly M Davis, George Luta, Amethyst Leimpeter, Tania Lobo, Scott P Kelly, Jun Shan, David Aaronson, Catherine A Tomko and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Barriers and facilitators to mobile health and active surveillance use among older adults with skin disease.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  9. Treatment decision-making in men with localized prostate cancer living in a remote area: A cross-sectional, observational study.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Selecting Active Surveillance: Decision Making Factors for Men with a Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2019
    Article
  13. Appraising risk in active surveillance of localized prostate cancer.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Discussing Conservative Management With Older Patients With CKD: An Interview Study of Nephrologists.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kathryn L TaylorCancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC. taylorkl@georgetown.edu.
Richard M HoffmanDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine/Iowa City VA Medical Center, Iowa.
Kimberly M DavisCancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
George LutaDepartment of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Amethyst LeimpeterDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California.
Tania LoboCancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Scott P KellyCancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Jun ShanDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California.
David AaronsonDepartment of Urology, Kaiser Permanente East Bay, Oakland, California.
Catherine A TomkoCancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Amy J StarostaCancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Charlotte J HagermanCancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Stephen K Van Den EedenDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California.

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Louis M Weiner · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Mark E Burkard · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
TREATMENT DECISIONS AND PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES IN LOW RISK PROSTATE CANCERR01CA155578 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TAYLOR, KATHRYN L, VAN DEN EEDEN, STEPHEN K. · 2011 to 2015
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS R01 CA155578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the concerns about the overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer, active surveillance (AS) is now a recommended alternative to the active treatments (AT) of surgery and radiotherapy. However, AS is not widely utilized, partially due to psychological and decision-making factors associated with treatment preferences.

methodsIn a longitudinal cohort study, we conducted pretreatment telephone interviews (N = 1,140, 69.3% participation) with newly diagnosed, low-risk prostate cancer patients (PSA ≤ 10, Gleason ≤ 6) from Kaiser Permanente Northern California. We assessed psychological and decision-making variables, and treatment preference [AS, AT, and No Preference (NP)].

resultsMen were 61.5 (SD, 7.3) years old, 24 days (median) after diagnosis, and 81.1% white. Treatment preferences were: 39.3% AS, 30.9% AT, and 29.7% NP. Multinomial logistic regression revealed that men preferring AS (vs. AT) were older (OR, 1.64; CI, 1.07-2.51), more educated (OR, 2.05; CI, 1.12-3.74), had greater prostate cancer knowledge (OR, 1.77; CI, 1.43-2.18) and greater awareness of having low-risk cancer (OR, 3.97; CI, 1.96-8.06), but also were less certain about their treatment preference (OR, 0.57; CI, 0.41-0.8), had greater prostate cancer anxiety (OR, 1.22; CI, 1.003-1.48), and preferred a shared treatment decision (OR, 2.34; CI, 1.37-3.99). Similarly, men preferring NP (vs. AT) were less certain about treatment preference, preferred a shared decision, and had greater knowledge.

conclusionsAlthough a substantial proportion of men preferred AS, this was associated with anxiety and uncertainty, suggesting that this may be a difficult choice. IMPACT: Increasing the appropriate use of AS for low-risk prostate cancer will require additional reassurance and information, and reaching men almost immediately after diagnosis while the decision-making is ongoing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(8); 1240-50. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

Decision MakingWatchful WaitingAgedAnxietyHumansLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPatient PreferenceProstatic NeoplasmsRiskSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID27257092
PMCPMC4970911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.