Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27256887›Full record

SynthesisIET nanobiotechnology2016

Evaluation of the effect of time on the distribution of zinc oxide nanoparticles in tissues of rats and mice: a systematic review.

Aijie Chen, Xiaoli Feng, Ting Sun, Yanli Zhang, Shengli An, Longquan Shao

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in IET nanobiotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aijie ChenNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoli FengNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Ting SunMedical Centre of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, 613 Huangpu Avenue West, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yanli ZhangNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Shengli AnGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Research, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Longquan ShaoNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. shaolongquan@smu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the time effect on the distribution of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) in tissues from rats and mice, a search on the PubMed, Embase, SpringerLink, Scopus, Science Direct, Cochrane, CNKI, Wanfang, and vip databases up to September 2014 was performed, followed by screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. Thirteen studies were included. At 24 h, Zn content was mainly distributed in the liver, kidney, and lung. At ≥7 days, Zn content was mainly distributed in the liver, kidney, lung, and brain. ZnO NPs are readily deposited in tissues. Furthermore, as time increases, Zn content decreases in the liver and kidney, but increases in the brain.

Indexed as

AnimalsKidneyLiverLungMetal NanoparticlesMiceRatsTime FactorsTissue DistributionZinc OxideZinc Oxide

Identifiers

PMID27256887
PMCPMC8676493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.