Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27256873›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2016

Patient Counseling and Management of Symptoms During Olaparib Therapy for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer.

Kathleen N Moore, Bradley J Monk

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Safety and management of niraparib monotherapy in ovarian cancer clinical trials.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Review
  7. Management of adverse events related to first-generation tyrosine receptor kinase inhibitors in adults: a narrative review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Sharing real-world experiences to optimize the management of olaparib toxicities: a practical guidance from an Italian expert panel.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Using PARP Inhibitors in Advanced Ovarian Cancer.Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.) · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathleen N MooreStephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA kathleen-moore@ouhsc.edu.
Bradley J MonkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arizona Cancer Center-Phoenix, Creighton University School of Medicine at Dignity Health, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Dignity Health · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelled: Our primary objective is to review the safety and tolerability profile of olaparib, a novel anticancer therapy, and to discuss key considerations for symptom management in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Olaparib is the first of a new class of anticancer therapies, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors that target tumors that have deficits in homologous recombination repair (such as BRCA mutations) by a process known as synthetic lethality. Through this process, neither the deficiency in homologous recombination repair nor PARP inhibition alone is cytotoxic, but the combination of these two conditions leads to cell death. In December 2014, olaparib received accelerated approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as monotherapy for patients with known or suspected deleterious germline BRCA-mutated (as detected by an FDA-approved test) advanced ovarian cancer who had been treated with at least three lines of chemotherapy. Most adverse events (AEs) reported during olaparib clinical trials conducted in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer and measurable disease were of grade 2 or less severity according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Fatigue and gastrointestinal AEs are among the most common in ovarian cancer clinical trials and can be particularly bothersome to patients. We focus on interventions to address these AEs in patients who are candidates for treatment with olaparib and allow them to remain on therapy for as long as clinically indicated. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Olaparib therapy represents a new approach to treating recurrent ovarian cancer. Some associated adverse events can have a substantial effect on quality of life. It is therefore important for patients, caregivers, and health care providers to have realistic expectations and a thorough understanding of the safety and tolerability profile of olaparib to prevent or alleviate key symptoms so that therapy can continue uninterrupted if possible. This report summarizes a practical approach to supportive care for patients receiving olaparib therapy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCounselingFemaleHumansMutationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOvarian NeoplasmsPhthalazinesPiperazinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsPoly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesQuality of LifeolaparibPhthalazinesPiperazinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsPoly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesBRCA mutationHomologous recombination pathwayOlaparibOvarian cancerPoly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARP)Toxicities

Identifiers

PMID27256873
PMCPMC4978548
OpenAlexW2412266476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.