Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27256851›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2016

Differentiation of Low- and High-Grade Gliomas Using High b-Value Diffusion Imaging with a Non-Gaussian Diffusion Model.

Y Sui, Y Xiong, J Jiang, M M Karaman, K L Xie, W Zhu, X J Zhou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of Free Water Correction on the Mean Diffusivity of Glioblastoma is Regional and b-value Dependent: A Retrospective Study on Open-source Datasets.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Diffusion MRI of cancer: From low to high b-values.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Y SuiFrom the Center for MR Research (Y.S., Y.X., M.M.K., X.J.Z.) Departments of Bioengineering (Y.S., X.J.Z.).ORCID 0000-0002-8177-1661
Y XiongFrom the Center for MR Research (Y.S., Y.X., M.M.K., X.J.Z.) Department of Radiology (Y.X., J.J., W.Z.), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6270-5220
J JiangDepartment of Radiology (Y.X., J.J., W.Z.), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0852-930X
M M KaramanFrom the Center for MR Research (Y.S., Y.X., M.M.K., X.J.Z.).ORCID 0000-0002-7080-7307
K L XieRadiology (K.L.X., X.J.Z.).ORCID 0000-0003-1373-2975
W ZhuDepartment of Radiology (Y.X., J.J., W.Z.), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China. xjzhou@uic.edu zhuwenzhen@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0254-6563
X J ZhouFrom the Center for MR Research (Y.S., Y.X., M.M.K., X.J.Z.) Departments of Bioengineering (Y.S., X.J.Z.) Radiology (K.L.X., X.J.Z.) Neurosurgery (X.J.Z.), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois xjzhou@uic.edu zhuwenzhen@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0793-4925
Tongji Hospital · CNSaint Xavier University · USWorld Wide Web Consortium · USXavier School · PHXuzhou Construction Machinery Group (China) · CN

Funding

A High-End 3 Tesla Human MRI Scanner Dedicated to ResearchS10RR028898 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI ZHOU, XIAOHONG JOE · 2010 to 2010
$2.9M
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR028898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeImaging-based tumor grading is highly desirable but faces challenges in sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy. A recently proposed diffusion imaging method by using a fractional order calculus model offers a set of new parameters to probe not only the diffusion process itself but also intravoxel tissue structures, providing new opportunities for noninvasive tumor grading. This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of using the fractional order calculus model to differentiate low- from high-grade gliomas in adult patients and illustrate its improved performance over a conventional diffusion imaging method using ADC (or D). MATERIALS AND

methodsFifty-four adult patients (18-70 years of age) with histology-proved gliomas were enrolled and divided into low-grade (n = 24) and high-grade (n = 30) groups. Multi-b-value diffusion MR imaging was performed with 17 b-values (0-4000 s/mm(2)) and was analyzed by using a fractional order calculus model. Mean values and SDs of 3 fractional order calculus parameters (D, β, and μ) were calculated from the normal contralateral thalamus (as a control) and the tumors, respectively. On the basis of these values, the low- and high-grade glioma groups were compared by using a Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess the performance of individual parameters and the combination of multiple parameters for low- versus high-grade differentiation.

resultsEach of the 3 fractional order calculus parameters exhibited a statistically higher value (P ≤ .011) in the low-grade than in the high-grade gliomas, whereas there was no difference in the normal contralateral thalamus (P ≥ .706). The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that β (area under the curve = 0.853) produced a higher area under the curve than D (0.781) or μ (0.703) and offered a sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 76.7%, and diagnostic accuracy of 82.1%.

conclusionsThe study demonstrated the feasibility of using a non-Gaussian fractional order calculus diffusion model to differentiate low- and high-grade gliomas. While all 3 fractional order calculus parameters showed statistically significant differences between the 2 groups, β exhibited a better performance than the other 2 parameters, including ADC (or D).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedArea Under CurveBrain NeoplasmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleGliomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityStatistics, NonparametricYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27256851
PMCPMC5018419
OpenAlexW2408762059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.