Trial reportTranslational behavioral medicine2017
Reach and representativeness of ethnic minority women in the Health Is Power Study: a longitudinal analysis.
Trial report in Translational behavioral medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility and acceptability of a faith-based mind-body intervention among African American adults.Translational behavioral medicine · 2020Trial
- Assessment of a Digital Health Platform Using Web Analytics and User Experience Measurements: Quantitative Study Based on RE-AIM.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Article
- Sociodemographic characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 serosurveillance studies with diverse recruitment strategies, Canada, 2020 to 2023.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Identifying recruitment strategies to improve the reach of evidence-based health promotion, disease prevention, and disease self-management interventions: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Evaluating the Dissemination and Implementation of a Community Health Worker-Based Community Wide Campaign to Improve Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Physical Activity among Latinos along the U.S.-Mexico Border.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Recruitment and retention of underrepresented and vulnerable populations to research.Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.) · 2021Article
- Scaling a Community-Wide Campaign Intervention to Manage Hypertension and Weight Loss.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Challenges in assessing population reach in a pragmatic trial.Preventive medicine reports · 2019Article
- RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review.Frontiers in public health · 2019Review
- The impact of religiosity on dietary habits and physical activity in minority women participating in the Health is Power (HIP) study.Preventive medicine reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reach is a key factor in translating research to practical application. This study examined reach and representativeness of a multi-city, randomized controlled community health trial in African American (AA) and Hispanic or Latina (HL) women. Participants completed measures of demographics, body mass index (BMI), percent body fat, resting heart rate, and blood pressure followed by a run-in procedure and a randomization meeting. AA were more likely to be screened out initially; HL were more likely to drop out. Participation did not differ by city or recruitment method. Women who completed the post-intervention assessment were more likely to be AA, older, and have higher socioeconomic status (p values < .05). This study showed moderate levels of reach but overrepresented higher educated, wealthier, and older women at the completion of the study. Representativeness can change over the course of the study and impact the practicality of translating research to practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.