Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27256455›Full record

ArticleAlternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA2016

Assessment of in vitro COPD models for tobacco regulatory science: Workshop proceedings, conclusions and paths forward for in vitro model use.

Holger Behrsing, Hans Raabe, Joseph Manuppello, Betsy Bombick, Rodger Curren, Kristie Sullivan, Sanjay Sethi, Richard Phipps, Yohannes Tesfaigzi, Sherwin Yan and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Pathway-based predictive approaches for non-animal assessment of acute inhalation toxicity.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.

Holger BehrsingInstitute for In Vitro Sciences, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Hans RaabeInstitute for In Vitro Sciences, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Joseph ManuppelloPETA International Science Consortium, Ltd, London, UK.
Betsy BombickR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Rodger CurrenInstitute for In Vitro Sciences, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Kristie SullivanPhysicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Sanjay SethiUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Richard PhippsUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Yohannes TesfaigziLovelace Respiratory Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Sherwin YanLorillard Tobacco Company, Greensboro, NC, USA.
Carl D'RuizLorillard Tobacco Company, Greensboro, NC, USA.
Robert TarranUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Samuel ConstantEpithelix Sàrl, Geneva, Switzerland.
Gary PhillipsBritish American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd, Southampton, UK.
Marianna GaçaBritish American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd, Southampton, UK.
Patrick HaydenMatTek Corporation, Ashland, MA, USA.
Xuefei CaoFDA-National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, AR, USA.
Carole MathisPhilip Morris Product SA, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Julia HoengPhilip Morris Product SA, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Armin BraunFraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Hannover, Germany.
Erin HillInstitute for In Vitro Sciences, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Institute for In Vitro Sciences · USBritish American Tobacco (United Kingdom) · GBPhilip Morris International (Switzerland) · CHFraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine · DELovelace Respiratory Research Institute · USMatTek Corporation (United States) · USNational Center for Toxicological Research · USPhysicians Committee for Responsible Medicine · USReynolds American (United States) · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

Assessment of In Vitro COPD Models for Tobacco Regulatory ScienceR13FD005299 · FDA · INSTITUTE FOR IN VITRO SCIENCES, INC. · PI BEHRSING, HOLGER P · 2015 to 2015
$50k
FDA HHS R13 FD005299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009 established the Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products (FDA-CTP), and gave it regulatory authority over the marketing, manufacture and distribution of tobacco products, including those termed 'modified risk'. On 8-10 December 2014, IIVS organised a workshop conference, entitled Assessment of In Vitro COPD Models for Tobacco Regulatory Science, to bring together stakeholders representing regulatory agencies, academia, industry and animal protection, to address the research priorities articulated by the FDA-CTP. Specific topics were covered to assess the status of current in vitro technologies as they are applied to understanding the adverse pulmonary events resulting from tobacco product exposure, and in particular, the progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The four topics covered were: a) Inflammation and Oxidative Stress; b) Ciliary Dysfunction and Ion Transport; c) Goblet Cell Hyperplasia and Mucus Production; and d) Parenchymal/Bronchial Tissue Destruction and Remodelling. The 2.5 day workshop included 18 expert speakers, plus poster sessions, networking and breakout sessions, which identified key findings and provided recommendations to advance the in vitro technologies and assays used to evaluate tobacco-induced disease etiologies. The workshop summary was reported at the 2015 Society of Toxicology Annual Meeting, and the recommendations led to an IIVS-organised technical workshop in June 2015, entitled Goblet Cell Hyperplasia, Mucus Production, and Ciliary Beating Assays, to assess these assays and to conduct a proof-of-principle multi-laboratory exercise to determine their suitability for standardisation. Here, we report on the proceedings, recommendations and outcomes of the December 2014 workshop, including paths forward to continue the development of non-animal methods to evaluate tissue responses that model the disease processes that may lead to COPD, a major cause of mortality worldwide.

Indexed as

Government RegulationAnimal ExperimentationAnimalsGoblet CellsHumansMucociliary ClearanceMucusNicotineOxidative StressPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveTobacco ProductsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationNicotine

Identifiers

PMID27256455
PMCPMC8450817
OpenAlexW2413862903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.