Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27256208›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2016

Development and Implementation of Culturally Tailored Offline Mobile Health Surveys.

Scott McIntosh, José Pérez-Ramos, Margaret M Demment, Carmen Vélez Vega, Esteban Avendaño, Deborah J Ossip, Timothy D Dye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Utilization of integrated health kiosks: A systematic review.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Scott McIntosh *School of Medicine & DentistryDepartment of Public Health SciencesUniversity of RochesterRochester, NYUnited States.ORCID 0000-0002-5776-9617
José Pérez-Ramos *School of Medicine & DentistryClinical and Translational Science InstituteUniversity of RochesterRochester, NYUnited States.ORCID 0000-0002-6654-6984
Margaret M Demment *School of Medicine & DentistryClinical and Translational Science InstituteUniversity of RochesterRochester, NYUnited States.ORCID 0000-0003-2377-4343
Carmen Vélez Vega *Recinto de Ciencias MédicasDepartamento de Ciencias SocialesUniversidad de Puerto RicoSan JuanPuerto Rico.ORCID 0000-0002-3147-4597
Esteban Avendaño *Universidad de Ciencias MédicasSan JoséCosta Rica.ORCID 0000-0002-5083-7242
Deborah J Ossip *School of Medicine & DentistryDepartment of Public Health SciencesUniversity of RochesterRochester, NYUnited States.ORCID 0000-0003-2918-597X
Timothy D Dye *School of Medicine & DentistryDepartment of Obstetrics & GynecologyUniversity of RochesterRochester, NYUnited States.ORCID 0000-0002-9801-4712

Funding

Research Experiences and Training Coordination CoreP42ES017198 · NIEHS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI HARRIS, SEAN M · 2010 to 2024
$38.6M
The University of Rochester's Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000042 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI BENNETT, NANCY M, KIEBURTZ, KARL D. · 2012 to 2015
$14.4M
Web-Assisted Tobacco Intervention with Community College StudentsR01CA152093 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MCINTOSH, SCOTT · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
MundoComm: ICT for Maternal Health in Costa Rica and Latin AmericaR25TW009697 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DYE, TIMOTHY DE VER, OSSIP, DEBORAH J · 2015 to 2017
$386k
ACL HHS U48DP005010ACL HHS U48DP005023ACL HHS U48DP005026FIC NIH HHS R25 TW009697NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000042NCI NIH HHS R01 CA152093NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES017198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn low and middle income countries (LMICs), and other areas with low resources and unreliable access to the Internet, understanding the emerging best practices for the implementation of new mobile health (mHealth) technologies is needed for efficient and secure data management and for informing public health researchers. Innovations in mHealth technology can improve on previous methods, and dissemination of project development details and lessons learned during implementation are needed to provide lessons learned to stakeholders in both the United States and LMIC settings.

objectiveThe aims of this paper are to share implementation strategies and lessons learned from the development and implementation stages of two survey research projects using offline mobile technology, and to inform and prepare public health researchers and practitioners to implement new mobile technologies in survey research projects in LMICs.

methodsIn 2015, two survey research projects were developed and piloted in Puerto Rico and pre-tested in Costa Rica to collect face-to-face data, get formative evaluation feedback, and to test the feasibility of an offline mobile data collection process. Fieldwork in each setting involved survey development, back translation with cultural tailoring, ethical review and approvals, data collector training, and piloting survey implementation on mobile tablets.

resultsCritical processes and workflows for survey research projects in low resource settings were identified and implemented. This included developing a secure mobile data platform tailored to each survey, establishing user accessibility, and training and eliciting feedback from data collectors and on-site LMIC project partners.

conclusionsFormative and process evaluation strategies are necessary and useful for the development and implementation of survey research projects using emerging mHealth technologies in LMICs and other low resource settings. Lessons learned include: (1) plan institutional review board (IRB) approvals in multiple countries carefully to allow for development, implementation, and feedback, (2) in addition to testing the content of survey instruments, allow time and consideration for testing the use of novel mHealth technology (hardware and software), (3) incorporate training for and feedback from project staff, LMIC partner staff, and research participants, and (4) change methods accordingly, including content, as mHealth technology usage influences and is influenced by the content and structure of the survey instrument. Lessons learned from early phases of LMIC research projects using emerging mHealth technologies are critical for informing subsequent research methods and study designs.

Indexed as

ethical reviewmobile healthsurvey research

Identifiers

PMID27256208
PMCPMC4911512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.