ArticleBMJ open2016
How do women trade-off benefits and risks in chemotherapy treatment decisions based on gene expression profiling for early-stage breast cancer? A discrete choice experiment.
Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preferences for genetic testing among populations underrepresented in genomic research: a systematic review.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis on Genetic Testing.The patient · 2022Pooled it
- Are there differences in health state preferences between urban and rural respondents? a comparison using time trade-off and discrete choice experiment.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- How to Present a Decision Object in Health Preference Research: Attributes and Levels, the Decision Model, and the Descriptive Framework.The patient · 2025Article
- Measuring Patient Preferences to Inform Clinical Trial Design: An Example in Rheumatoid Arthritis.The patient · 2025Article
- Improving patient understanding of GEP test results (IMPARTER4): an RCT.BMJ oncology · 2025Article
- Valuing Chinese medicine quality of life-11 dimensions (CQ-11D) health states using a discrete choice experiment with survival duration (DCEHealth and quality of life outcomes · 2023Article
- Unsettling the treatment imperative? Chemotherapy decision-making in the wake of genomic techniques.Sociology of health & illness · 2023Article
- Allocating healthcare resources to genomic testing in Canada: latest evidence and current challenges.Journal of community genetics · 2022Article
- The Role of the 21-Gene Recurrence ScoreCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Review
- From the patient to the population: Use of genomics for population screening.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Using Breast Cancer Gene Expression Signatures in Clinical Practice: Unsolved Issues, Ongoing Trials and Future Perspectives.Cancers · 2021Review
- Valuation of SF-6Dv2 Health States in China Using Time Trade-off and Discrete-Choice Experiment with a Duration Dimension.PharmacoEconomics · 2021Article
- Genomic Testing for Relapsed and Refractory Lymphoid Cancers: Understanding Patient Values.The patient · 2021Article
- The value of genomic sequencing in complex pediatric neurological disorders: a discrete choice experiment.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Article
- Patient preferences for first-line treatment of classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a US survey and discrete choice experiment.Leukemia & lymphoma · 2020Article
- Patients' perceptions of 70-gene signature testing: commonly changing the initial inclination to undergo or forego chemotherapy and reducing decisional conflict.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2020Article
- Article
- Can precision medicine help achieve the goal of reducing care when the risks exceed the benefits?Personalized medicine · 2019Article
- Lessons learned from a cancer knowledge translation grants program: results of an evaluation.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesGene expression profiling (GEP) of tumours informs baseline risk prediction, potentially affecting adjuvant chemotherapy decisions for women with early-stage breast cancer. Since only 15% will experience a recurrence, concerns have been raised about potential harms from overtreatment and high GEP costs in publicly funded healthcare systems. We aimed to estimate preferences and personal utility of GEP testing information and benefit-risk trade-offs in chemotherapy treatment decisions. DESIGN, SETTING AND
interventionBased on literature review and findings from our qualitative research (focus groups, interviews with patients with breast cancer and medical oncologists), we developed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey and administered it via an internet panel. The DCE included 12 choice tasks with 5 attributes and 3 alternatives considering orthogonality, D-efficiency and level balance.
participantsThe DCE survey was administered to 1004 Canadian women from the general population.
main outcome measuresPreferences were analysed using conditional logit and hierarchical Bayes and evaluated for goodness of fit. We conducted simulation analyses for alternative scenarios.
resultsGEP test score indicating likely benefit from chemotherapy was the most important attribute. Doctor's clinical estimate of the risk of cancer returning, trust in your cancer doctor and side effects of chemotherapy (temporary and permanent) were relatively less important but showed significant differences among levels. In the scenario analyses, 78% were likely to choose chemotherapy in a high-risk scenario, 55% in a moderate-risk scenario and 33% in a low-risk scenario, with the other attributes held constant. A high GEP score was more important in influencing the choice of chemotherapy for those at intermediate clinical risk.
conclusionsGEP testing information influences chemotherapy treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer and varies depending on clinical risk. Clinicians should be aware of these differences and tailor the use of GEP testing accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.