ArticleClinical oral investigations2017
Attitudes, practice, and experience of German dentists regarding repair restorations.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Patients' Preferences for Repair Versus Replacement Restorations
Qualitative Interview Study Regarding Dentists' Repair Behaviour
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Long-Term Repair Bond Strength of Aged Methacrylate-Based Resin Composite Restorations: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.BioMed research international · 2022Pooled it
- Adoption of minimally invasive dentistry in Palestine: assessing practices and barriers - a cross-sectional study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- The current attitudes and practices of dentists in Australia towards composite repair: A cross-sectional survey study.Australian dental journal · 2025Article
- Review
- EVIDENCE-PRACTICE GAP IN TREATMENT DECISIONS ABOUT DEFECTIVE COMPOSITE AND AMALGAM RESTORATIONS AMONG BRAZILIAN DENTISTS.Brazilian journal of oral sciences · 2023Article
- Minimal intervention in dentistry: which is the best approach for silorane composite restoration repairs?Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2021Article
- Secondary caries: what is it, and how it can be controlled, detected, and managed?Clinical oral investigations · 2020Review
- Quality of Information Regarding Repair Restorations on Dentist Websites: Systematic Search and Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Secondary caries: prevalence, characteristics, and approach.Clinical oral investigations · 2020Article
- Is composite repair suitable for anterior restorations? A long-term practice-based clinical study.Clinical oral investigations · 2019Article
- Trends in caries experience in the permanent dentition in Germany 1997-2014, and projection to 2030: Morbidity shifts in an aging society.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Bonding performance of self-adhesive flowable composites to enamel, dentin and a nano-hybrid composite.Odontology · 2018Article
- Reparative Dentistry: Possibilities and Limitations.Current oral health reports · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of the present study was to perform a representative survey among German dentists about attitudes, practice, and experience regarding single-tooth repair restorations. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn anonymous questionnaire was designed and mailed to all registered dentists in Lower Saxony (n = 6600). Twenty-eight percent were returned (n = 1852), and n = 1805 could be analyzed. Statistical analyses were done by Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and ordered logistic regressions (p < 0.05).
resultsOnly 2.2 % of the dentists declared to never perform repair restorations. Composite restorations were repaired significantly more often than all other materials. Frequency of performing repair restorations was partially associated to dentist-related factors. The decision for repairing a restoration was dependent on several tooth- and restoration-associated variables. The main indications for repair were the partial loss of restoration or adjacent tooth structure as well as chipping and endodontic access cavities of crowns. Repair restorations were mostly done with composite using various different preconditioning techniques. Overall patients' acceptance was reported to be high. Most of the dentists considered repair restorations as permanent restoration with a moderate to high longevity. Estimated success of repair restorations depended significantly on the dentists' experiences (frequency and techniques of repair restorations).
conclusionsRepair restorations were often performed and were well accepted by dentists and patients, but indications for repair restorations as well as applied materials and techniques varied distinctly. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Repairs of single-tooth restorations are well accepted and frequently performed, but indications, techniques, and materials require further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27255959What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.