Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27255905›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2016

[Manual medicine and osteopathic methods on the growing spine].

R Kayser, G Harke

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R KayserAbt. Orthopädie, MEDIAN-Klinik Wismar, Ernst-Scheel-Str. 28, 23986, Wismar, Deutschland. ralph.kayser@median-kliniken.de.
G HarkeManuelle Medizin und Osteopathie, Praxis für Physikalische und Rehabilitative Medizin, Schlossstr. 26, 12163, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of various techniques in manual medicine on infants, toddlers and adolescents enjoys widespread acknowledgement not only in the musculoskeletal field but also beyond that. For a long time, the seminars of the DGMM have been trying to structure the advanced training of doctors and the vocational training of physiotherapists and to adjust it according to the latest clinical and scientific findings (in this subject matter). Considering the controversial debates, this seems particularly necessary and meaningful. This article aims to identify the current state of discussion and the consensus between medical associations but it also means to provide assistance in daily routine.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCombined Modality TherapyDiagnosis, DifferentialEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleGermanyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleManipulation, ChiropracticManipulation, OsteopathicSpinal DiseasesChildren, preschoolManipulation, chiropracticManual therapiesOsteopathyPhysiotherapy (techniques)

Identifiers

PMID27255905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.