Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27255863›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular biology2016

Challenges in structural approaches to cell modeling.

Wonpil Im, Jie Liang, Arthur Olson, Huan-Xiang Zhou, Sandor Vajda, Ilya A Vakser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. GRAMMCell: Docking-based Cell Modeling Resource.Journal of molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Efficient Design of AffilinInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Docking-based long timescale simulation of cell-size protein systems at atomic resolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Building Structural Models of a Whole Mycoplasma Cell.Journal of molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Challenges in protein docking.Current opinion in structural biology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Art and Science of the Cellular Mesoscale.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Whole-Cell Models and Simulations in Molecular Detail.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Modeling Crowded Environment in Molecular Simulations.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wonpil ImCenter for Computational Biology and Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, United States. Electronic address: wonpil@ku.edu.
Jie LiangDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, United States. Electronic address: jliang@uic.edu.
Arthur OlsonDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, United States. Electronic address: olson@scripps.edu.
Huan-Xiang ZhouDepartment of Physics and Institute of Molecular Biophysics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, United States. Electronic address: hzhou4@fsu.edu.
Sandor VajdaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, United States. Electronic address: vajda@bu.edu.
Ilya A VakserCenter for Computational Biology and Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, United States. Electronic address: vakser@ku.edu.

Funding

Synthetic Antigen Binder CoreU54GM087519 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ZHOU, MING · 2010 to 2017
$31.9M
National Biomedical Computation Resource - Competitive Revision SupplementP41GM103426 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI AMARO, ROMMIE E · 2012 to 2019
$14.0M
Analysis and Prediction of Molecular InteractionsR35GM118078 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI SANDOR VAJDA · 2016 to 2026
$6.5M
Integrated Resource for Protein Recognition StudiesR01GM074255 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI VAKSER, ILYA · 2005 to 2024
$6.2M
A MULTISTAGE APPROACH TO PROTEIN-PROTEIN DOCKINGR01GM061867 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI VAJDA, SANDOR · 2000 to 2016
$4.0M
Computational assembly of beta-barrel membrane proteinsR01GM079804 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI LIANG, JIE · 2007 to 2016
$2.8M
Modeling Crowding and Confinement of Cellular EnvironmentsR01GM088187 · NIGMS · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHOU, HUAN-XIANG · 2010 to 2015
$1.6M
Mechanisms & Energetics of Transmembrane-induced Signaling of Cytokine ReceptorsR01GM092950 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI IM, WONPIL · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
Refinement Methods for Protein Docking based on Exploring Multi-Dimensional EnergR01GM093147 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI KOZAKOV, DMYTRO, PASCHALIDIS, IOANNIS · 2011 to 2014
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103426NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061867NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074255NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079804NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088187NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092950NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093147NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118078NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM087519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational modeling is essential for structural characterization of biomolecular mechanisms across the broad spectrum of scales. Adequate understanding of biomolecular mechanisms inherently involves our ability to model them. Structural modeling of individual biomolecules and their interactions has been rapidly progressing. However, in terms of the broader picture, the focus is shifting toward larger systems, up to the level of a cell. Such modeling involves a more dynamic and realistic representation of the interactomes in vivo, in a crowded cellular environment, as well as membranes and membrane proteins, and other cellular components. Structural modeling of a cell complements computational approaches to cellular mechanisms based on differential equations, graph models, and other techniques to model biological networks, imaging data, etc. Structural modeling along with other computational and experimental approaches will provide a fundamental understanding of life at the molecular level and lead to important applications to biology and medicine. A cross section of diverse approaches presented in this review illustrates the developing shift from the structural modeling of individual molecules to that of cell biology. Studies in several related areas are covered: biological networks; automated construction of three-dimensional cell models using experimental data; modeling of protein complexes; prediction of non-specific and transient protein interactions; thermodynamic and kinetic effects of crowding; cellular membrane modeling; and modeling of chromosomes. The review presents an expert opinion on the current state-of-the-art in these various aspects of structural modeling in cellular biology, and the prospects of future developments in this emerging field.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalCell MembraneComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHumansMembrane ProteinsModels, MolecularThermodynamicsMembrane Proteinscellular membraneschromosome modelingmacromolecular crowdingmodeling of biological mesoscaleprotein interactions

Identifiers

PMID27255863
PMCPMC4976022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.