ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2016
Development and validation of the Slovenian drug-related problem classification system based on the PCNE classification V 6.2.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved adherence with Medicines Use Review service in Slovenia: a randomized controlled trial.BMC health services research · 2021Trial
- Development and evaluation of the pharmacist intervention evaluation (PIE) system: a modified classification for drug-related problems in Chinese tertiary hospitals.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Clinical pharmacist prescriber in primary care in Slovenia: prospective non-randomised interventional study focused on clinical outcomes and quality of life.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Clinical pharmacist recommendations in daily interdisciplinary ward rounds at a psychiatric hospital: a retrospective pre-post study on drug-related problems focused in somatic comorbidities.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- The Translation Process of Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe v9.00 to Bahasa Indonesia: An Instrument to Detect Drug-Related Problem.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2022Article
- Positive evidence for clinical pharmacist interventions during interdisciplinary rounding at a psychiatric hospital.Scientific reports · 2021Observational
- Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) drug-related problem classification version 9.00: German translation and validation.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2021Article
- Drug-Related Problems and Their Predictors Among Patients with Diabetes Attending the Ambulatory Clinic of Gebre Tsadik Shawo General Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2020Article
- Impact of clinical pharmacist's interventions on pharmacotherapy management in elderly patients on polypharmacy with mental health problems including quality of life: A prospective non-randomized study.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Classifying drug-related problems increases pharmacists' awareness of patients' drug-related needs and supports the development of counselling skills through increased awareness of the nature and frequency of drug-related problems. No standardised classification system was used in daily pharmacy practice in Slovenia. Objective To translate, upgrade and validate the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) classification V 6.2 for use in Slovenian community pharmacies. Setting Expert panel meetings at the Faculty of Pharmacy and home-based classification validation. Methods The PCNE classification V 6.2 was translated to Slovenian language by forward-backward translation procedure. An expert panel consisting of nine practicing pharmacists upgraded the content of the translated version. Thirty-one community pharmacists validated this version with the PCNE set of 18 patient cases by coding problems, risk factors and interventions they believed were present in each case. The expert panel discussed the results and upgraded the classification accordingly. Afterwards, 33 community pharmacists validated the upgraded version with a set of 40 actual Slovenian pharmacy patient cases. Based on the results, the expert panel formed a final version of the classification. Main outcome measure Coding consistency between community pharmacists. Results The expert panel performed some major modifications to the PCNE classification V 6.2: the potential problem was added as a sub domain to problems domain; the term adverse drug event was used instead of adverse drug reaction; the causes domain was renamed to risk factors and its sub domains were organized into prescribing, dispensing and use of drugs; dispensing errors were specified; use of drugs was organized into intentional and unintentional use of drugs; the sub domains in the interventions domain were divided according to the communication and agreement with the prescriber. The average coding consistencies in the first validation study were 75 % (±16 %) for problems, 74 % (±20 %) for risk factors and 94 % (±10 %) for interventions. The average coding consistencies in the second validation study were 83 % (±16 %) for problems, 85 % (±17 %) for risk factors and 80 % (±20 %) for interventions. Conclusion A drug-related problem classification for use in Slovenian community pharmacies was developed based on The PCNE classification V 6.2. The validation studies demonstrated high coding consistencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27255777What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.