Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27255435›Full record

ReviewActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2016

Scandinavian SSAI clinical practice guideline on pre-hospital airway management.

M Rehn, P K Hyldmo, V Magnusson, J Kurola, P Kongstad, L Rognås, L K Juvet, M Sandberg

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Airway management skills and devices on Italian helicopter emergency medical service: a national survey.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Confined space airway management: a narrative review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Review
  12. Non-invasive ventilation for preoxygenation during prehospital anaesthesia - a prospective observational study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Observational
  13. Current trends in emergency airway management: a clinical review.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

M RehnThe Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway.
P K HyldmoThe Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway.
V MagnussonDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.
J KurolaCentre for Pre-hospital Emergency Care, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
P KongstadDepartment of Pre-hospital Care and Disaster Medicine, Region of Skåne, Lund, Sweden.
L RognåsPre-hospital Critical Care Service, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
L K JuvetNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
M SandbergAir Ambulance Department, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKBarts Health NHS Trust · GBKuopio University Hospital · FINational University Hospital of Iceland · ISNorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOOslo University Hospital · NOSørlandet Sykehus · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Scandinavian society of anaesthesiology and intensive care medicine task force on pre-hospital airway management was asked to formulate recommendations following standards for trustworthy clinical practice guidelines.

methodsThe literature was systematically reviewed and the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) system was applied to move from evidence to recommendations.

resultsWe recommend that all emergency medical service (EMS) providers consider to: apply basic airway manoeuvres and airway adjuncts (good practice recommendation); turn unconscious non-trauma patients into the recovery position when advanced airway management is unavailable (good practice recommendation); turn unconscious trauma patients to the lateral trauma position while maintaining spinal alignment when advanced airway management is unavailable [strong recommendation, low quality of evidence (QoE)]. We suggest that intermediately trained providers use a supraglottic airway device (SAD) or basic airway manoeuvres on patients in cardiac arrest (weak recommendation, low QoE). We recommend that advanced trained providers consider using an SAD in selected indications or as a rescue device after failed endotracheal intubation (ETI) (good practice recommendation). We recommend that ETI should only be performed by advanced trained providers (strong recommendation, low QoE). We suggest that videolaryngoscopy is considered for ETI when direct laryngoscopy fails or is expected to be difficult (weak recommendation, low QoE). We suggest that advanced trained providers apply cricothyroidotomy in 'cannot intubate, cannot ventilate' situations (weak recommendation, low QoE).

conclusionThis guideline for pre-hospital airway management includes a combination of techniques applied in a stepwise fashion appropriate to patient clinical status and provider training.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAirway ManagementEmergency Medical ServicesHumansScandinavian and Nordic CountriesSocieties, Medical

Identifiers

PMID27255435
PMCPMC5089575
OpenAlexW2417143709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.