Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27255400›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2017

Prediction of infarction development after endovascular stroke therapy with dual-energy computed tomography.

Tanja Djurdjevic, Rafael Rehwald, Michael Knoflach, Benjamin Matosevic, Stefan Kiechl, Elke Ruth Gizewski, Bernhard Glodny, Astrid Ellen Grams

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tanja DjurdjevicDepartment of Neuroradiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Rafael RehwaldDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Michael KnoflachDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Benjamin MatosevicDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Stefan KiechlDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Elke Ruth GizewskiDepartment of Neuroradiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Bernhard GlodnyDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Astrid Ellen GramsDepartment of Neuroradiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria. astrid.grams@i-med.ac.at.
Innsbruck Medical University · ATUniversität Innsbruck · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAfter intraarterial recanalisation (IAR), the haemorrhage and the blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption can be distinguished using dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). The aim of the present study was to investigate whether future infarction development can be predicted from DECT.

methodsDECT scans of 20 patients showing 45 BBB disrupted areas after IAR were assessed and compared with follow-up examinations. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analyses using densities from the iodine map (IM) and virtual non-contrast (VNC) were performed.

resultsFuture infarction areas are denser than future non-infarction areas on IM series (23.44 ± 24.86 vs. 5.77 ± 2.77; p < 0.0001) and more hypodense on VNC series (29.71 ± 3.33 vs. 35.33 ± 3.50; p < 0.0001). ROC analyses for the IM series showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99 (cut-off: <9.97 HU; p < 0.05; sensitivity 91.18 %; specificity 100.00 %; accuracy 0.93) for the prediction of future infarctions. The AUC for the prediction of haemorrhagic infarctions was 0.78 (cut-off >17.13 HU; p < 0.05; sensitivity 90.00 %; specificity 62.86 %; accuracy 0.69). The VNC series allowed prediction of infarction volume.

conclusionsFuture infarction development after IAR can be reliably predicted with the IM series. The prediction of haemorrhages and of infarction size is less reliable. KEY POINTS: • The IM series (DECT) can predict future infarction development after IAR. • Later haemorrhages can be predicted using the IM and the BW series. • The volume of definable hypodense areas in VNC correlates with infarction volume.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood-Brain BarrierCerebral HemorrhageCerebral InfarctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultBlood-brain barrier disruptionCerebral infarctionDual-energy computed tomographyEndovascular stroke therapyIntracranial haemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID27255400
PMCPMC5591619
OpenAlexW2417522421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.