Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27255388›Full record

ArticleJournal of structural biology2016

Deducing the symmetry of helical assemblies: Applications to membrane proteins.

Nicolas Coudray, Ralph Lasala, Zhening Zhang, Kathy M Clark, Mark E Dumont, David L Stokes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of structural biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Contrasting Modes of Self-Assembly and Hydrogen-Bonding Heterogeneity in Chlorosomes ofThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2018
    Article
  7. Structural basis for the alternating access mechanism of the cation diffusion facilitator YiiP.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  8. Structure of the SLC4 transporter Bor1p in an inward-facing conformation.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicolas CoudraySkirball Institute for Biomolecular Medicine, Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Ralph LasalaSkirball Institute for Biomolecular Medicine, Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Zhening ZhangSkirball Institute for Biomolecular Medicine, Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Kathy M ClarkDepartment of Pediatrics and Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14652, United States.
Mark E DumontDepartment of Pediatrics and Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14652, United States.
David L StokesSkirball Institute for Biomolecular Medicine, Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONU54GM094598 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI STOKES, DAVID L. · 2010 to 2014
$8.3M
Multi-Level Optimization of Membrane Proteins for CrystallographyU54GM094611 · NIGMS · HAUPTMAN-WOODWARD MEDICAL RESEARCH INST · PI DUMONT, MARK E. · 2010 to 2014
$6.3M
High-throughput Pipeline for Electron CrystallographyR01GM095747 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI STOKES, DAVID L. · 2010 to 2013
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM095747NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM094598NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM094611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Helical reconstruction represents a convenient and powerful approach for structure determination of macromolecules that assemble into helical arrays. In the case of membrane proteins, formation of tubular crystals with helical symmetry represents an attractive alternative, especially when their small size precludes the use of single-particle analysis. An essential first step for helical reconstruction is to characterize the helical symmetry. This process is often daunting, due to the complexity of helical diffraction and to the low signal-to-noise ratio in images of individual assemblies. Furthermore, the large diameters of the tubular crystals produced by membrane proteins exacerbates the innate ambiguities that, if not resolved, will produce incorrect structures. In this report, we describe a set of tools that can be used to eliminate ambiguities and to validate the choice of symmetry. The first approach increases the signal-to-noise ratio along layer lines by incoherently summing data from multiple helical assemblies, thus producing several candidate indexing schemes. The second approach compares the layer lines from images with those from synthetic models built with the various candidate schemes. The third approach uses unit cell dimensions measured from collapsed tubes to distinguish between these candidate schemes. These approaches are illustrated with tubular crystals from a boron transporter from yeast, Bor1p, and a β-barrel channel from the outer membrane of E. coli, OmpF.

Indexed as

Protein Conformation, alpha-HelicalCryoelectron MicroscopyEscherichia coliImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMembrane ProteinsMembrane Transport ProteinsModels, MolecularPorinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsBor1 protein, S cerevisiaeMembrane ProteinsMembrane Transport ProteinsOmpF proteinPorinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins3D reconstructionCryo-EMElectron microscopyHelical symmetryImage analysisMembrane proteinsTubular crystals

Identifiers

PMID27255388
PMCPMC4944209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.