Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27255289›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2017

Phase I study of orally administered S-1 in combination with epirubicin and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors and chemotherapy-naïve advanced or metastatic esophagogastric cancer.

Markus Moehler, Rolf Mahlberg, Volker Heinemann, Radka Obermannová, Eugen Kubala, Bohuslav Melichar, Arndt Weinmann, Paul Scigalla, Marietta Tesařová, Petr Janda and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Correlation between Immunohistochemical Markers in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells andCanadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Markus MoehlerI. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. markus.moehler@unimedizin-mainz.de.
Rolf MahlbergMutterhaus Der Borromaerinnen, Trier, Germany.
Volker HeinemannDepartment of Medical Oncology, Klinikum Grosshadern, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Radka ObermannováClinic of Comprehensive Cancer Care, MOU, Brno, Czech Republic.
Eugen KubalaFaculty Hospital Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Bohuslav MelicharPalacky University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Arndt WeinmannI. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Paul ScigallaPharmaceutical Research Consulting, Berlin, Germany.
Marietta TesařováPrague Clinical Services, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr JandaPrague Clinical Services, Prague, Czech Republic.
Fabienne Hédouin-BivilleNordic Group, Paris, France.
Wasat MansoorThe Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEKlinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen · DENordic Pharma (France) · FRPalacký University Olomouc · CZThe Christie Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital Brno · CZUniversity Hospital Hradec Králové · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis phase I study investigated the safety and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 when combined with epirubicin and oxaliplatin (EOS).

methodsPatients aged ≥18 years with advanced or metastatic solid tumors were enrolled in a 3 + 3 design with S-1 dose escalation (two planned cohorts) performed according to the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). On day 1 of each 21-day cycle, patients received epirubicin 50 mg/m

resultsDLT was reported for two of the five patients in cohort 2, defining 20 mg/m

conclusionsThe promising activity of EOS (S-1 dose level, 25 mg/m

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDrug CombinationsEpirubicinEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessDrug CombinationsEpirubicinOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinOxonic AcidS 1 (combination)TegafurAdvanced gastric cancerEpirubicinFirst-line chemotherapyOxaliplatinS-1

Identifiers

PMID27255289
OpenAlexW2416897745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.