Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27255153›Full record

ArticleBMC developmental biology2016

Adhesive organ regeneration in Macrostomum lignano.

Birgit Lengerer, Elise Hennebert, Patrick Flammang, Willi Salvenmoser, Peter Ladurner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC developmental biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The muscle and neural architecture ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The Involvement of Cell-Type-Specific Glycans inBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Temporary adhesion of the proseriate flatworm Minona ileanae.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  14. Identifying adhesive components in a model tunicate.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. A mechanism for temporary bioadhesion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Birgit LengererInstitute of Zoology and Center of Molecular Bioscience Innsbruck, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstr. 25, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Elise HennebertBiology of Marine Organisms and Biomimetics, Research Institute for Biosciences, University of Mons, 23 Place du Parc, 7000, Mons, Belgium.
Patrick FlammangBiology of Marine Organisms and Biomimetics, Research Institute for Biosciences, University of Mons, 23 Place du Parc, 7000, Mons, Belgium.
Willi SalvenmoserInstitute of Zoology and Center of Molecular Bioscience Innsbruck, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstr. 25, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Peter LadurnerInstitute of Zoology and Center of Molecular Bioscience Innsbruck, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstr. 25, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria. peter.ladurner@uibk.ac.at.
Universität Innsbruck · ATUniversity of Mons · BE

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 25404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlatworms possess pluripotent stem cells that can give rise to all cell types, which allows them to restore lost body parts after injury or amputation. This makes flatworms excellent model systems for studying regeneration. In this study, we present the adhesive organs of a marine flatworm as a simple model system for organ regeneration. Macrostomum lignano has approximately 130 adhesive organs at the ventral side of its tail plate. One adhesive organ consists of three interacting cells: one adhesive gland cell, one releasing gland cell, and one modified epidermal cell, called an anchor cell. However, no specific markers for these cell types were available to study the regeneration of adhesive organs.

resultsWe tested 15 commercially available lectins for their ability to label adhesive organs and found one lectin (peanut agglutinin) to be specific to adhesive gland cells. We visualized the morphology of regenerating adhesive organs using lectin- and antibody staining as well as transmission electron microscopy. Our findings indicate that the two gland cells differentiate earlier than the connected anchor cells. Using EdU/lectin staining of partially amputated adhesive organs, we showed that their regeneration can proceed in two ways. First, adhesive gland cell bodies are able to survive partial amputation and reconnect with newly formed anchor cells. Second, adhesive gland cell bodies are cleared away, and the entire adhesive organ is build anew.

conclusionOur results provide the first insights into adhesive organ regeneration and describe ten new markers for differentiated cells and tissues in M. lignano. The position of adhesive organ cells within the blastema and their chronological differentiation have been shown for the first time. M. lignano can regenerate adhesive organs de novo but also replace individual anchor cells in an injured organ. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of organogenesis in flatworms and enable further molecular investigations of cell-fate decisions during regeneration.

Indexed as

RegenerationAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedHelminth ProteinsModels, BiologicalOrganogenesisPeanut AgglutininPlatyhelminthsStem CellsHelminth ProteinsPeanut AgglutininDuo-gland systemFlatwormLectinMarine adhesionSuperresolution microscopyTEM

Identifiers

PMID27255153
PMCPMC4890501
OpenAlexW2409238058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.