ReviewCanadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie2016
The "Vulnerability" of Psychiatric Research Participants: Why This Research Ethics Concept Needs to Be Revisited.
Review in Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vulnerability in procedural ethics: A study of 44 national research ethics guidelines.Qualitative research : QR · 2026Article
- Ethical challenges researchers encounter during the informed consent processes for research involving people with schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder: a qualitative assessment.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Research ethics in practice: An analysis of ethical issues encountered in qualitative health research with mental health service users and relatives.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2023Article
- Perspectives: Creating equitable participation in mental health research: a case of epistemic justice.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2023Article
- Experiences of Everyday Life among Individuals with Co-Existence of Serious Mental Illness and Cancer-A Qualitative Systematic Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Situational vulnerability within mental healthcare - a qualitative analysis of ethical challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC medical ethics · 2023Article
- Article
- Postsurgical morbidity and mortality favorably informs deep brain stimulation for new indications including schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- Informed consent, genomic research and mental health: A integrative review.Nursing ethics · 2022Review
- Participating in Longitudinal Observational Research on Psychiatric Rehabilitation: Quantitative Results From a Patient Perspective Study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Factors Influencing Perceived Helpfulness and Participation in Innovative Research: A Pilot Study of Individuals with and without Mood Symptoms.Ethics & behavior · 2022Article
- "It's all about delivery": researchers and health professionals' views on the moral challenges of accessing neurobiological information in the context of psychosis.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- Psychosis, vulnerability, and the moral significance of biomedical innovation in psychiatry. Why ethicists should join efforts.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2020Article
- Instrumentalist analyses of the functions of ethics concept-principles: a proposal for synergetic empirical and conceptual enrichment.Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2019Article
- Capacity, Vulnerability, and Informed Consent for Research.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2018Article
- The concept of 'vulnerability' in research ethics: an in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines.Health research policy and systems · 2017Article
- Experiences of Hospitalization of Patients With Psychotic Disorders on Medical-Surgical Units: A Thematic Analysis.Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses AssociationArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.