Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27254477›Full record

ArticlePhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP2016

Calculating binding free energies of host-guest systems using the AMOEBA polarizable force field.

David R Bell, Rui Qi, Zhifeng Jing, Jin Yu Xiang, Christopher Mejias, Michael J Schnieders, Jay W Ponder, Pengyu Ren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Atomic Polarizabilities for Interactive Dipole Induction Models.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. AMOEBA+ Classical Potential for Modeling Molecular Interactions.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Tinker 8: Software Tools for Molecular Design.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2018
    Article
  20. Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David R Bell *Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States.
Rui Qi *Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States.
Zhifeng Jing *Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States.
Jin Yu XiangComputational and Molecular Biophysics Program, Washington Univ. School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.
Christopher MejiasDepartment of Chemistry, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.
Michael J SchniedersDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Department of Biochemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Jay W PonderDepartment of Chemistry, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.
Pengyu RenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States.

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Douglas Robert Spitz · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
DEVELOPMENT OF A NEXT-GENERATION NUCLEIC ACID FORCE FIELDR01GM106137 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JAY PONDER, Pengyu Ren · 2013 to 2026
$3.5M
Specificity and Selectivity in Protein-Ion BindingR01GM114237 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI PONDER, JAY, REN, PENGYU · 2015 to 2023
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106137NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular recognition is of paramount interest in many applications. Here we investigate a series of host-guest systems previously used in the SAMPL4 blind challenge by using molecular simulations and the AMOEBA polarizable force field. The free energy results computed by Bennett's acceptance ratio (BAR) method using the AMOEBA polarizable force field ranked favorably among the entries submitted to the SAMPL4 host-guest competition [Muddana, et al., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des., 2014, 28, 305-317]. In this work we conduct an in-depth analysis of the AMOEBA force field host-guest binding thermodynamics by using both BAR and the orthogonal space random walk (OSRW) methods. The binding entropy-enthalpy contributions are analyzed for each host-guest system. For systems of inordinate binding entropy-enthalpy values, we further examine the hydrogen bonding patterns and configurational entropy contribution. The binding mechanism of this series of host-guest systems varies from ligand to ligand, driven by enthalpy and/or entropy changes. Convergence of BAR and OSRW binding free energy methods is discussed. Ultimately, this work illustrates the value of molecular modelling and advanced force fields for the exploration and interpretation of binding thermodynamics.

Identifiers

PMID27254477
PMCPMC5102783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.