Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27254461›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2016

A method for detergent-free isolation of membrane proteins in their local lipid environment.

Sarah C Lee, Tim J Knowles, Vincent L G Postis, Mohammed Jamshad, Rosemary A Parslow, Yu-Pin Lin, Adrian Goldman, Pooja Sridhar, Michael Overduin, Stephen P Muench and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 181 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
181citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

181 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular Mechanisms Governing Peptide Nanodisc Assembly and Stability.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Amphiphilic Copolymers and Their Role in the Study of Membrane Proteins.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025
    Review
  18. Comparison of lipid dynamics and permeability in styrene-maleic acid and diisobutylene-maleic acid copolymer lipid nanodiscs by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

121 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sarah C LeeSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Tim J KnowlesSchool of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Vincent L G PostisSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Mohammed JamshadSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Rosemary A ParslowSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Yu-Pin LinSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Adrian GoldmanSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8032-9700
Pooja SridharSchool of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Michael OverduinSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Stephen P MuenchSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6869-4414
Timothy R DaffornSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H016309/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H024697/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I005579/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I020349/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J017310/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K004441/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M018261/1Medical Research Council G1000567Medical Research Council G100567Wellcome Trust 091322/7/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the great importance of membrane proteins, structural and functional studies of these proteins present major challenges. A significant hurdle is the extraction of the functional protein from its natural lipid membrane. Traditionally achieved with detergents, purification procedures can be costly and time consuming. A critical flaw with detergent approaches is the removal of the protein from the native lipid environment required to maintain functionally stable protein. This protocol describes the preparation of styrene maleic acid (SMA) co-polymer to extract membrane proteins from prokaryotic and eukaryotic expression systems. Successful isolation of membrane proteins into SMA lipid particles (SMALPs) allows the proteins to remain with native lipid, surrounded by SMA. We detail procedures for obtaining 25 g of SMA (4 d); explain the preparation of protein-containing SMALPs using membranes isolated from Escherichia coli (2 d) and control protein-free SMALPS using E. coli polar lipid extract (1-2 h); investigate SMALP protein purity by SDS-PAGE analysis and estimate protein concentration (4 h); and detail biophysical methods such as circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation (svAUC) to undertake initial structural studies to characterize SMALPs (∼2 d). Together, these methods provide a practical tool kit for those wanting to use SMALPs to study membrane proteins.

Indexed as

Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsMaleatesMembrane LipidsMembrane ProteinsModels, MolecularPolystyrenesSolubilityEscherichia coli ProteinsMaleatesMembrane LipidsMembrane ProteinsPolystyrenesstyrene-maleic acid polymer

Identifiers

PMID27254461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.