Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27254113›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2016

Missing Data in Alcohol Clinical Trials with Binary Outcomes.

Kevin A Hallgren, Katie Witkiewitz, Henry R Kranzler, Daniel E Falk, Raye Z Litten, Stephanie S O'Malley, Raymond F Anton, In conjunction with the Alcohol Clinical Trials Initiative (ACTIVE) Workgroup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Missing Data Sensitivity Analyses for Alcohol Research.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kevin A HallgrenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Katie WitkiewitzDepartment of Psychology, Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Henry R KranzlerDepartment of Psychiatry and Center for Studies of Addiction, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Daniel E FalkNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Rockville, Maryland.
Raye Z LittenNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Rockville, Maryland.
Stephanie S O'MalleyDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Raymond F AntonDepartment of Psychiatry, Addiction Sciences Division, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
In conjunction with the Alcohol Clinical Trials Initiative (ACTIVE) Workgroup

Funding

TREATING ETHANOL WITHDRAWAL WITH LORAZEPAM/NALTREXONEP50AA010761 · NIAAA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI HOWARD C. BECKER · 1996 to 2026
$46.8M
Psychology Training in Alcohol Research (PTAR)T32AA007455 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MARY E. LARIMER · 1985 to 2026
$11.4M
Precision Medicine and Recovery in a Telehealth Treatment Program for Alcohol Use DisorderR01AA022328 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI Katie A Witkiewitz · 2013 to 2026
$3.1M
Developing a tool to assess, provide feedback, and facilitate discussion of mechanisms of change in frontline addiction treatmentK01AA024796 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HALLGREN, KEVIN A. · 2016 to 2020
$870k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA024796NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA010761NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA022328NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMissing data are common in alcohol clinical trials for both continuous and binary end points. Approaches to handle missing data have been explored for continuous outcomes, yet no studies have compared missing data approaches for binary outcomes (e.g., abstinence, no heavy drinking days). This study compares approaches to modeling binary outcomes with missing data in the COMBINE study.

methodsWe included participants in the COMBINE study who had complete drinking data during treatment and who were assigned to active medication or placebo conditions (N = 1,146). Using simulation methods, missing data were introduced under common scenarios with varying sample sizes and amounts of missing data. Logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of naltrexone (vs. placebo) in predicting any drinking and any heavy drinking outcomes at the end of treatment using 4 analytic approaches: complete case analysis (CCA), last observation carried forward (LOCF), the worst case scenario (WCS) of missing equals any drinking or heavy drinking, and multiple imputation (MI). In separate analyses, these approaches were compared when drinking data were manually deleted for those participants who discontinued treatment but continued to provide drinking data.

resultsWCS produced the greatest amount of bias in treatment effect estimates. MI usually yielded less biased estimates than WCS and CCA in the simulated data and performed considerably better than LOCF when estimating treatment effects among individuals who discontinued treatment.

conclusionsMissing data can introduce bias in treatment effect estimates in alcohol clinical trials. Researchers should utilize modern missing data methods, including MI, and avoid WCS and CCA when analyzing binary alcohol clinical trial outcomes.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalAdultComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMaleModels, StatisticalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicYoung AdultAlcohol Clinical TrialsMissing DataMultiple ImputationNaltrexoneSimulation Study

Identifiers

PMID27254113
PMCPMC5522809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.