Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27254107›Full record

ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2016

Reduced Graphene Oxide-GelMA Hybrid Hydrogels as Scaffolds for Cardiac Tissue Engineering.

Su Ryon Shin, Claudio Zihlmann, Mohsen Akbari, Pribpandao Assawes, Louis Cheung, Kaizhen Zhang, Vijayan Manoharan, Yu Shrike Zhang, Mehmet Yüksekkaya, Kai-Tak Wan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 143 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
143citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

143 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Human cardiovascular organoids: Biomedical applications and ethical challenges.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

83 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Su Ryon ShinBiomaterials Innovation Research Center, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Claudio ZihlmannBiomaterials Innovation Research Center, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Mohsen AkbariBiomaterials Innovation Research Center, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Pribpandao AssawesBiomaterials Innovation Research Center, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Louis CheungDepartment of Chemistry and Waterloo Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada.
Kaizhen ZhangDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Vijayan ManoharanBiomaterials Innovation Research Center, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Yu Shrike ZhangBiomaterials Innovation Research Center, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Mehmet YüksekkayaFaculty of Engineering, Biomedical Engineering Department, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey.
Kai-Tak WanDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Mehdi NikkhahSchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85251, USA.
Mehmet R DokmeciBiomaterials Innovation Research Center, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Xiaowu Shirley TangDepartment of Chemistry and Waterloo Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada.
Ali KhademhosseiniBiomaterials Innovation Research Center, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.

Funding

Microengineered Osteons for Bone Tissue EngineeringR01AR057837 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI YANG, YUNZHI · 2010 to 2018
$5.1M
3D combinatorial microenvironments for effective cell based therapyR01HL099073 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KHADEMHOSSEINI, ALI, LIAO, RONGLIH · 2010 to 2013
$2.6M
Engineering Vascularized Bone Tissues By Microfabrication And ScaffoldingR01DE021468 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI YANG, YUNZHI · 2011 to 2014
$1.8M
A Microfabrication Platform for Direct Printing Vascularized Functional Tissue CoR01EB012597 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHEN, SHAOCHEN · 2010 to 2013
$1.4M
Microengineered Osteoinductive and Vasculogenic ScaffoldR56AR063745 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI JABBARI, ESMAIEL · 2013 to 2014
$669k
A miniaturized model of human skin and lymph node for drug discovery and testingR56AI105024 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KHADEMHOSSEINI, ALI · 2014 to 2014
$442k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL099073NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI105024NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR057837NIAMS NIH HHS R56 AR063745NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB012597NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE021468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomaterials currently used in cardiac tissue engineering have certain limitations, such as lack of electrical conductivity and appropriate mechanical properties, which are two parameters playing a key role in regulating cardiac cell behavior. Here, the myocardial tissue constructs are engineered based on reduced graphene oxide (rGO)-incorporated gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hybrid hydrogels. The incorporation of rGO into the GelMA matrix significantly enhances the electrical conductivity and mechanical properties of the material. Moreover, cells cultured on composite rGO-GelMA scaffolds exhibit better biological activities such as cell viability, proliferation, and maturation compared to ones cultured on GelMA hydrogels. Cardiomyocytes show stronger contractility and faster spontaneous beating rate on rGO-GelMA hydrogel sheets compared to those on pristine GelMA hydrogels, as well as GO-GelMA hydrogel sheets with similar mechanical property and particle concentration. Our strategy of integrating rGO within a biocompatible hydrogel is expected to be broadly applicable for future biomaterial designs to improve tissue engineering outcomes. The engineered cardiac tissue constructs using rGO incorporated hybrid hydrogels can potentially provide high-fidelity tissue models for drug studies and the investigations of cardiac tissue development and/or disease processes in vitro.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsGelatinGraphiteHydrogelsMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsGelatinGraphiteHydrogelsbioactuatorcardiac tissue engineeringgelatinhydrogelreduced graphene oxide

Identifiers

PMID27254107
PMCPMC5201005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.