Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27253872›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Genome Assembly of the Fungus Cochliobolus miyabeanus, and Transcriptome Analysis during Early Stages of Infection on American Wildrice (Zizania palustris L.).

Claudia V Castell-Miller, Juan J Gutierrez-Gonzalez, Zheng Jin Tu, Kathryn E Bushley, Matthieu Hainaut, Bernard Henrissat, Deborah A Samac

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genetic diversity and structure ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  6. Prospects for anti-Cell surface (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Analysis of the Transcriptome inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Claudia V Castell-MillerDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Juan J Gutierrez-GonzalezDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Zheng Jin TuMayo Clinic, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Kathryn E BushleyDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Matthieu HainautCNRS UMR 7257, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Bernard HenrissatCNRS UMR 7257, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Deborah A SamacDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
University of Minnesota · USAix-Marseille Université · FRKing Abdulaziz University · SAMayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fungus Cochliobolus miyabeanus causes severe leaf spot disease on rice (Oryza sativa) and two North American specialty crops, American wildrice (Zizania palustris) and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum). Despite the importance of C. miyabeanus as a disease-causing agent in wildrice, little is known about either the mechanisms of pathogenicity or host defense responses. To start bridging these gaps, the genome of C. miyabeanus strain TG12bL2 was shotgun sequenced using Illumina technology. The genome assembly consists of 31.79 Mbp in 2,378 scaffolds with an N50 = 74,921. It contains 11,000 predicted genes of which 94.5% were annotated. Approximately 10% of total gene number is expected to be secreted. The C. miyabeanus genome is rich in carbohydrate active enzymes, and harbors 187 small secreted peptides (SSPs) and some fungal effector homologs. Detoxification systems were represented by a variety of enzymes that could offer protection against plant defense compounds. The non-ribosomal peptide synthetases and polyketide synthases (PKS) present were common to other Cochliobolus species. Additionally, the fungal transcriptome was analyzed at 48 hours after inoculation in planta. A total of 10,674 genes were found to be expressed, some of which are known to be involved in pathogenicity or response to host defenses including hydrophobins, cutinase, cell wall degrading enzymes, enzymes related to reactive oxygen species scavenging, PKS, detoxification systems, SSPs, and a known fungal effector. This work will facilitate future research on C. miyabeanus pathogen-associated molecular patterns and effectors, and in the identification of their corresponding wildrice defense mechanisms.

Indexed as

AscomycotaGene Expression ProfilingGenome, FungalOryzaPanicumPathogen-Associated Molecular Pattern MoleculesPeptide SynthasesPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesPolyketide SynthasesTranscriptomeUnited StatesPathogen-Associated Molecular Pattern MoleculesPeptide SynthasesPolyketide Synthases

Identifiers

PMID27253872
PMCPMC4890743
OpenAlexW2415299461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.