Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27253518›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

CD44 Splice Variant v8-10 as a Marker of Serous Ovarian Cancer Prognosis.

Amanda Sosulski, Heiko Horn, Lihua Zhang, Caroline Coletti, Vinod Vathipadiekal, Cesar M Castro, Michael J Birrer, Osamu Nagano, Hideyuki Saya, Kasper Lage and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. RNA-binding proteins regulating the CD44 alternative splicing.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Amanda SosulskiPediatric Surgical Research Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Heiko HornPediatric Surgical Research Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Lihua ZhangPediatric Surgical Research Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Caroline ColettiPediatric Surgical Research Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Vinod VathipadiekalGynecological Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Cesar M CastroGynecological Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Michael J BirrerGynecological Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Osamu NaganoDivision of Gene Regulation, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, School of Medicine, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideyuki SayaDivision of Gene Regulation, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, School of Medicine, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kasper LagePediatric Surgical Research Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Patricia K DonahoePediatric Surgical Research Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
David PépinPediatric Surgical Research Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USJapan Science and Technology Agency · JPBroad Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD44 is a transmembrane hyaluronic acid receptor gene that encodes over 100 different tissue-specific protein isoforms. The most ubiquitous, CD44 standard, has been used as a cancer stem cell marker in ovarian and other cancers. Expression of the epithelial CD44 variant containing exons v8-10 (CD44v8-10) has been associated with more chemoresistant and metastatic tumors in gastrointestinal and breast cancers, but its role in ovarian cancer is unknown; we therefore investigated its use as a prognostic marker in this disease. The gene expression profiles of 254 tumor samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas RNAseqV2 were analyzed for the presence of CD44 isoforms. A trend for longer survival was observed in patients with high expression of CD44 isoforms that include exons v8-10. Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of tumors for presence of CD44v8-10 was performed on an independent cohort of 210 patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer using a tumor tissue microarray. Patient stratification based on software analysis of staining revealed a statistically significant increase in survival in patients with the highest levels of transmembrane protein expression (top 10 or 20%) compared to those with the lowest expression (bottom 10 and 20%) (p = 0.0181, p = 0.0262 respectively). Expression of CD44v8-10 in primary ovarian cancer cell lines was correlated with a predominantly epithelial phenotype characterized by high expression of epithelial markers and low expression of mesenchymal markers by qPCR, Western blot, and IHC. Conversely, detection of proteolytically cleaved and soluble extracellular domain of CD44v8-10 in patient ascites samples was correlated with significantly worse prognosis (p<0.05). Therefore, presence of transmembrane CD44v8-10 on the surface of primary tumor cells may be a marker of a highly epithelial tumor with better prognosis while enzymatic cleavage of CD44v8-10, as detected by presence of the soluble extracellular domain in ascites fluid, may be indicative of a more metastatic disease and worse prognosis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlternative SplicingBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialExonsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplastic Stem CellsOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisProtein IsoformsTissue Array AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorCD44 protein, humanHyaluronan ReceptorsProtein Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID27253518
PMCPMC4890777
OpenAlexW2412789074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.