Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27253443›Full record

ArticleNeuron2016

Melanopsin: The Tale of the Tail.

Russell N Van Gelder, Ethan D Buhr

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A systematic comparison of optogenetic approaches to visual restoration.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Russell N Van GelderDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98104, USA; Department of Biological Structure, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98104, USA; Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98104, USA. Electronic address: russvg@uw.edu.
Ethan D BuhrDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this issue of Neuron, Mure et al. (2016) demonstrate that two mechanisms-phosphorylation of a C-terminal intracellular region, and mechanism involving the whole of the C terminus-oppositely shape the kinetics and sensitivity of the nonvisual photoreceptor melanopsin.

Indexed as

Retinal Ganglion CellsRod OpsinsHumansMelanopsinPhosphorylationMelanopsinRod Opsinsintrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cellMelanopsinphosphorylationretina

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.