Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27253422›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2016

Spatial Distribution of Mycobacterium ulcerans in Buruli Ulcer Lesions: Implications for Laboratory Diagnosis.

Marie-Thérèse Ruf, Miriam Bolz, Moritz Vogel, Pierre F Bayi, Martin W Bratschi, Ghislain Emmanuel Sopho, Dorothy Yeboah-Manu, Alphonse Um Boock, Thomas Junghanss, Gerd Pluschke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Buruli ulcer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Immunohistochemistry: A Method to Analyze M. ulcerans Infected Skin Tissue.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Susceptibility toFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Marie-Thérèse RufSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Miriam BolzSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Moritz VogelSection Clinical Tropical Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Pierre F BayiFairmed, Bureau Régional pour l'Afrique, B.P. 5807, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Martin W BratschiSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Ghislain Emmanuel SophoCentre de Depistage et de Traitement de l'Ulcere de Buruli d'Allada, Allada, Benin.
Dorothy Yeboah-ManuNoguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.
Alphonse Um BoockFairmed, Bureau Régional pour l'Afrique, B.P. 5807, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Thomas JunghanssSection Clinical Tropical Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Gerd PluschkeSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHHeidelberg University · DEUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Ghana · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent laboratory diagnosis of Buruli ulcer (BU) is based on microscopic detection of acid fast bacilli, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), histopathology or cultivation. Insertion sequence (IS) 2404 qPCR, the most sensitive method, is usually only available at reference laboratories. The only currently available point-of-care test, microscopic detection of acid fast bacilli (AFB), has limited sensitivity and specificity. METHODOLOGY/ PRINCIPAL

findingsHere we analyzed AFB positive tissue samples (n = 83) for the presence, distribution and amount of AFB. AFB were nearly exclusively present in the subcutis with large extracellular clusters being most frequently (67%) found in plaque lesions. In ulcerative lesions small clusters and dispersed AFB were more common. Beside this, 151 swab samples from 37 BU patients were analyzed by IS2404 qPCR and ZN staining in parallel. The amount of M. ulcerans DNA in extracts from swabs correlated well with the probability of finding AFB in direct smear microscopy, with 56.1% of the samples being positive in both methods and 43.9% being positive only in qPCR. By analyzing three swabs per patient instead of one, the probability to have at least one positive swab increased from 80.2% to 97.1% for qPCR and from 45% to 66.1% for AFB smear examination. CONCLUSION / SIGNIFICANCE: Our data show that M. ulcerans bacteria are primarily located in the subcutis of BU lesions, making the retrieval of the deep subcutis mandatory for examination of tissue samples for AFB. When laboratory diagnosis is based on the recommended less invasive collection of swab samples, analysis of three swabs from different areas of ulcerative lesions instead of one increases the sensitivity of both qPCR and of smear microscopy substantially.

Indexed as

Buruli UlcerDNA, BacterialHumansMycobacterium ulceransSkinSkin UlcerDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID27253422
PMCPMC4890796
OpenAlexW2411122899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.