Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27253385›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Quality of Life and Mortality of Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Survivors in the Seattle Colorectal Cancer Family Registry.

Scott V Adams, Rachel Ceballos, Polly A Newcomb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The effect of ginseng extract on fatigue in cancer survivors: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  3. Occupational therapy to improve quality of life for colorectal cancer survivors: a randomized clinical trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Health-related quality of life and lifestyle in long-term survivors of colorectal cancer and a matched non-cancer reference group.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  6. Health-related quality of life trajectories in older adult long-term survivors of colorectal cancer.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Quality of Life Outcomes in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. The prevalence and risk of symptom and function clusters in colorectal cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2022
    Article
  13. Anxiety, depression, health-related quality of life, and mortality among colorectal patients: 5-year follow-up.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Observational
  14. Article
  15. Symptom burden, psychological distress, and health-related quality of life in cancer survivors with pelvic late radiation tissue injuries.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. A survey of cancer patients, caregivers, and providers regarding familiarity, importance, and utilization of supportive and integrative oncology services.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Scott V AdamsPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Rachel CeballosPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Polly A NewcombPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America.

Funding

SEATTLE FAMILIAL COLORECTAL CANCER REGISTRYU01CA074794 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI NEWCOMB, POLLY A · 1997 to 2007
$14.1M
Colon Cancer Family Registry CohortUM1CA167551 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HAILE, ROBERT WILLIAM, JENKINS, MARK A · 2013 to 2017
$11.3M
The Colon Cancer Family Registry: SeattleU24CA074794 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI NEWCOMB, POLLY A · 2008 to 2011
$7.0M
Training and Research in Colon Cancer SurvivalK05CA152715 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI NEWCOMB, POLLY A · 2010 to 2019
$991k
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA152715NCI NIH HHS U01 CA074794NCI NIH HHS U24 CA074794NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA167551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimBecause most colorectal cancer patients survive beyond five years, understanding quality of life among these long-term survivors is essential to providing comprehensive survivor care. We sought to identify personal characteristics associated with reported quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors, and sub-groups of survivors potentially vulnerable to very low quality of life.

methodsWe assessed quality of life using the Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey within a population-based sample of 1,021 colorectal cancer survivors in the Seattle Colorectal Cancer Family Registry, approximately 5 years post-diagnosis. In this case-only study, mean physical component summary scores and mental component summary scores were examined with linear regression. To identify survivors with substantially reduced ability to complete daily tasks, logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios for "very low" summary scores, defined as a score in the lowest decile of the reference US population. All cases were followed for vital status following QoL assessment, and mortality was analyzed with Cox proportional hazards regression.

resultsLower mean physical component summary score was associated with older age, female sex, obesity, smoking, and diabetes or other co-morbidity; lower mean mental component summary score was associated with younger age and female sex. Higher odds of very low physical component summary score was associated with older age, obesity, less education, smoking, co-morbidities, and later stage at diagnosis; smoking was associated with higher odds of very low mental component summary score. A very low physical component score was associated with higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 3.97 (2.95-5.34)).

conclusionsOur results suggest that identifiable sub-groups of survivors are vulnerable to very low physical components of quality of life, decrements that may represent meaningful impairment in completing everyday tasks and are associated with higher risk of death.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSurvivorsAgedColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedMortalitySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID27253385
PMCPMC4890809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.