Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27253202›Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2016

Aligning organizational priorities with ARC to improve youth mental health service outcomes.

Charles Glisson, Nathaniel J Williams, Anthony Hemmelgarn, Enola Proctor, Philip Green

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Pursuit of Quality for Social Work Practice: Three Generations and Counting.Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charles GlissonCenter for Behavioral Health Research, University of Tennessee.
Nathaniel J WilliamsCollege of Social Work, Boise State University.
Anthony HemmelgarnCenter for Behavioral Health Research, University of Tennessee.
Enola ProctorBrown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis.
Philip GreenCenter for Behavioral Health Research, University of Tennessee.

Funding

Testing an Organizational Implementation Strategy in Children's Mental HealthR01MH084855 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI GLISSON, CHARLES A · 2009 to 2013
$3.0M
Understanding the impact of organizational implementation strategies on EBT useF31MH099846 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI WILLIAMS, NATHANIEL J. · 2012 to 2014
$98k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH099846NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Availability, Responsiveness, and Continuity (ARC) organizational intervention is designed to improve community-based youth mental health services by aligning organizational priorities with 5 principles of effective service organizations (i.e., mission driven, results oriented, improvement directed, relationship centered, participation based). This study assessed the effect of the ARC intervention on youth outcomes and the mediating role of organizational priorities as a mechanism linking the ARC intervention to outcomes.

methodFourteen community-based mental health agencies in a midwestern metropolis along with 475 clinicians and 605 youth (ages 5-18) served by those agencies were randomly assigned to the 3-year ARC intervention or control condition. The agencies' priorities were measured with the ARC Principles Questionnaire (APQ) completed by clinicians at the end of the intervention. Youth outcomes were measured as total problems in psychosocial functioning described by their caregivers using the Shortform Assessment for Children (SAC) at 6 monthly intervals.

resultsThe rate of improvement in youths' psychosocial functioning in agencies assigned to the ARC condition was 1.6 times the rate of improvement in agencies assigned to the control condition, creating a standardized difference in functioning of d = .23 between the 2 groups at the 6-month follow-up. The effect on youth outcomes was fully mediated by the alignment of organizational priorities described in the 5 ARC principles (d = .21).

conclusionThe ARC organizational intervention improves youth outcomes by aligning organizational priorities with the 5 ARC principles. The findings suggest that organizational priorities explain why some community mental health agencies are more effective than others. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

Outcome and Process Assessment, Health CareQuality ImprovementAdolescentAdolescent Health ServicesChildChild Health ServicesChild, PreschoolCommunity Mental Health ServicesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMental Disorders

Identifiers

PMID27253202
PMCPMC4949090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.