Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27253173›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2016

Conisation as a marker of persistent human papilloma virus infection and risk of breast cancer.

Mette Søgaard, Dora K Farkas, Anne G Ording, Henrik T Sørensen, Deirdre P Cronin-Fenton

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. HPV-Associated Breast Cancer: Myth or Fact?Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mette SøgaardDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Dora K FarkasDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Anne G OrdingDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Henrik T SørensenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Deirdre P Cronin-FentonDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Aarhus University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) infection may increase breast cancer (BC) risk.

methodsTo examine this, we used nationwide medical registries to identify all Danish women who underwent conisation to remove HPV-associated cervical precancerous lesions (n=87 782) from 1978 to 2013. We computed the absolute risk of BC and standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for breast cancer, based on national breast cancer incidence rates.

resultsConisation was associated with slightly increased BC incidence (SIR=1.1, 95% CI=1.0-1.1), and an absolute BC risk of 7.7% (95% CI=7.3-8.1%) in 35.9 years of follow-up. BC risk was elevated throughout follow-up, especially in the first 5 years (<1 year: SIR=1.2, 95% CI=0.92-1.5; 1-5 years: SIR=1.2, 95% CI=1.1-1.3; ⩾5 years: SIR=1.1, 95% CI=1.0-1.1). Women who underwent conisation and had autoimmune disease had elevated BC risk after 5 years of follow-up (SIR=1.4, 95% CI=1.0-1.8).

conclusionsBC risk is slightly elevated in women with persistent HPV infection, possibly due to detection bias.

Indexed as

ConizationAdultBreast NeoplasmsDenmarkFemaleHumansPapillomavirus InfectionsRisk FactorsUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID27253173
PMCPMC4997534
OpenAlexW2473207421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.