Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27253172›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2016

Contemporary accuracy of death certificates for coding prostate cancer as a cause of death: Is reliance on death certification good enough? A comparison with blinded review by an independent cause of death evaluation committee.

Emma L Turner, Chris Metcalfe, Jenny L Donovan, Sian Noble, Jonathan A C Sterne, J Athene Lane, Eleanor I Walsh, Elizabeth M Hill, Liz Down, Yoav Ben-Shlomo and 19 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 15 institutions in 3 countries.

Emma L TurnerSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
Chris MetcalfeSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
Jenny L DonovanSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
Sian NobleSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
Jonathan A C SterneSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
J Athene LaneSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
Eleanor I WalshSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
Elizabeth M HillSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
Liz DownSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
Yoav Ben-ShlomoSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
Steven E OliverDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York and the Hull York Medical School, YO10 5DD, UK.
Simon EvansUrology Department, Royal United Hospital, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK.
Peter BrindleAvon Primary Care Research Collaborative, South Plaza, Marlborough Street, Bristol BS1 3NX, UK.
Naomi J WilliamsSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK.
Laura J HughesDepartment of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Box 279 (S4), Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Charlotte F DaviesSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
Siaw Yein NgSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Freeman Hospital, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK.
David E NealNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Freddie C HamdyNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Peter AlbertsenUniversity of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, St Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Hartford, CT, USA.
Colette M ReidDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol BS2 8ED, UK.
Jon OxleyDepartment of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK.
John McFarlaneUrology Department, Royal United Hospital, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK.
Mary C RobinsonDepartment of Cellular Pathology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK.
Jan AdolfssonDepartment of Clinical Science, Karolinska Institutet, Stokholm, Sweden.
Anthony ZietmanHarvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael BaumDepartment of Surgery, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Anthony KoupparisDepartment of Urology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK.
Richard M MartinSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
University of Bristol · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBRoyal United Hospital · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBAt Bristol · GBBristol Clinical Commissioning Group · GBHarvard University · USHull York Medical School · GBKarolinska Institutet · SENorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBRoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GBRoyal Victoria Infirmary · GBSouthmead Hospital · GBUConn Health · USUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate cause of death assignment is crucial for prostate cancer epidemiology and trials reporting prostate cancer-specific mortality outcomes.

methodsWe compared death certificate information with independent cause of death evaluation by an expert committee within a prostate cancer trial (2002-2015).

resultsOf 1236 deaths assessed, expert committee evaluation attributed 523 (42%) to prostate cancer, agreeing with death certificate cause of death in 1134 cases (92%, 95% CI: 90%, 93%). The sensitivity of death certificates in identifying prostate cancer deaths as classified by the committee was 91% (95% CI: 89%, 94%); specificity was 92% (95% CI: 90%, 94%). Sensitivity and specificity were lower where death occurred within 1 year of diagnosis, and where there was another primary cancer diagnosis.

conclusionsUK death certificates accurately identify cause of death in men with prostate cancer, supporting their use in routine statistics. Possible differential misattribution by trial arm supports independent evaluation in randomised trials.

Indexed as

AgedCause of DeathDeath CertificatesHumansMaleProstateProstatic NeoplasmsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID27253172
PMCPMC4931376
OpenAlexW2416887093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.