Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27252654›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2016

Pelleted Bone Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Are Better Protected from the Deleterious Effects of Arthroscopic Heat Shock.

Gauthaman Kalamegam, Mohammed Abbas, Mamdooh Gari, Haneen Alsehli, Roaa Kadam, Mohammed Alkaff, Adeel Chaudhary, Mohammed Al-Qahtani, Adel Abuzenadah, Wael Kafienah and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gauthaman KalamegamCenter of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz UniversityJeddah, Saudi Arabia; Sheik Salem Bin Mahfouz Scientific Chair for Treatment of Osteoarthritis by Stem Cells, King Abdulaziz UniversityJeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AbbasSheik Salem Bin Mahfouz Scientific Chair for Treatment of Osteoarthritis by Stem Cells, King Abdulaziz UniversityJeddah, Saudi Arabia; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University HospitalJeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mamdooh GariCenter of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz UniversityJeddah, Saudi Arabia; Sheik Salem Bin Mahfouz Scientific Chair for Treatment of Osteoarthritis by Stem Cells, King Abdulaziz UniversityJeddah, Saudi Arabia; Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz UniversityJeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Haneen AlsehliFaculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Center of Innovation in Personalized Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Roaa KadamCenter of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AlkaffSheik Salem Bin Mahfouz Scientific Chair for Treatment of Osteoarthritis by Stem Cells, King Abdulaziz UniversityJeddah, Saudi Arabia; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University HospitalJeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Adeel ChaudharyCenter of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Al-QahtaniCenter of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Adel AbuzenadahCenter of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz UniversityJeddah, Saudi Arabia; Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Center of Innovation in Personalized Medicine, King Abdulaziz UniversityJeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Wael KafienahSchool of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol Bristol, UK.
Ali MobasheriCenter of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz UniversityJeddah, Saudi Arabia; The D-BOARD European Consortium for Biomarker Discovery, The APPROACH Innovative Medicines Initiative Consortium, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of SurreySurrey, UK; Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, Arthritis Research UK Pain Centre, Medical Research Council and Arthritis Research UK Centre for Musculoskeletal Aging Research, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical CentreNottingham, UK.
King Abdulaziz University · SAKing Abdulaziz Hospital · SAQueen's Medical Centre · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe impact of arthroscopic temperature on joint tissues is poorly understood and it is not known how mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) respond to the effects of heat generated by the device during the process of arthroscopy assisted experimental cell-based therapy. In the present study, we isolated and phenotypically characterized human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (hBMMSCs) from osteoarthritis (OA) patients, and evaluated the effect of arthroscopic heat on cells in suspension and pellet cultures.

methodsPrimary cultures of hBMMSCs were isolated from bone marrow aspirates of OA patients and cultured using DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and characterized for their stemness. hBMMSCs (1 × 10(6) cells) cultured as single cell suspensions or cell pellets were exposed to an illuminated arthroscope for 10, 20, or 30 min. This was followed by analysis of cellular proliferation and heat shock related gene expression.

resultshBMMSCs were viable and exhibited population doubling, short spindle morphology, MSC related CD surface markers expression and tri-lineage differentiation into adipocytes, chondrocytes and osteoblasts. Chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation increased collagen production and alkaline phosphatase activity. Exposure of hBMMSCs to an illuminated arthroscope for 10, 20, or 30 min for 72 h decreased metabolic activity of the cells in suspensions (63.27% at 30 min) and increased metabolic activity in cell pellets (62.86% at 10 min and 68.57% at 20 min). hBMMSCs exposed to 37, 45, and 55°C for 120 s demonstrated significant upregulation of BAX, P53, Cyclin A2, Cyclin E1, TNF-α, and HSP70 in cell suspensions compared to cell pellets.

conclusionshBMMSC cell pellets are better protected from temperature alterations compared to cell suspensions. Transplantation of hBMMSCs as pellets rather than as cell suspensions to the cartilage defect site would therefore support their viability and may aid enhanced cartilage regeneration.

Indexed as

cell viabilitydifferentiationfluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS)heat shockmesenchymal stem cellsosteoarthritis (OA)population doubling

Identifiers

PMID27252654
PMCPMC4877393
OpenAlexW2407579693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.