Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27252643›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2016

Synergy of AMPA and NMDA Receptor Currents in Dopaminergic Neurons: A Modeling Study.

Denis Zakharov, Christopher Lapish, Boris Gutkin, Alexey Kuznetsov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neural Coding With Bursts-Current State and Future Perspectives.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Denis ZakharovNonlinear Dynamics Department, Institute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Science (RAS) Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Christopher LapishDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Boris GutkinGroup of Neural Theory, Ecole Normale Supérieure (ENS)Paris, France; Centre for Cognition and Decision Making, National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscow, Russia.
Alexey KuznetsovDepartment of Mathematical Sciences and Center for Mathematical Modeling and Computational Sciences, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USÉcole Normale Supérieure - PSL · FRInstitute of Applied Physics · RU

Funding

CRCNS: Alcohol modulation of dopamine-GABA dynamics in the ventral tegmental areaR01AA022821 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI KUZNETSOV, ALEXEY S · 2013 to 2015
$539k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA022821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dopaminergic (DA) neurons display two modes of firing: low-frequency tonic and high-frequency bursts. The high frequency firing within the bursts is attributed to NMDA, but not AMPA receptor activation. In our models of the DA neuron, both biophysical and abstract, the NMDA receptor current can significantly increase their firing frequency, whereas the AMPA receptor current is not able to evoke high-frequency activity and usually suppresses firing. However, both currents are produced by glutamate receptors and, consequently, are often co-activated. Here we consider combined influence of AMPA and NMDA synaptic input in the models of the DA neuron. Different types of neuronal activity (resting state, low frequency, or high frequency firing) are observed depending on the conductance of the AMPAR and NMDAR currents. In two models, biophysical and reduced, we show that the firing frequency increases more effectively if both receptors are co-activated for certain parameter values. In particular, in the more quantitative biophysical model, the maximal frequency is 40% greater than that with NMDAR alone. The dynamical mechanism of such frequency growth is explained in the framework of phase space evolution using the reduced model. In short, both the AMPAR and NMDAR currents flatten the voltage nullcline, providing the frequency increase, whereas only NMDA prevents complete unfolding of the nullcline, providing robust firing. Thus, we confirm a major role of the NMDAR in generating high-frequency firing and conclude that AMPAR activation further significantly increases the frequency.

Indexed as

AMPA receptorsdopaminergic neuronsexcitatory stimulihigh frequency activityNMDA receptors

Identifiers

PMID27252643
PMCPMC4877376
OpenAlexW2400089514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.