Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27252607›Full record

ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2015

[Not Available].

R Le Floch, E Naux, J F Arnould

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [The ambient air andAnnals of burns and fire disasters · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Public health action · 2023
    Article
  4. Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2021
    Article
  5. Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2021
    Article
  6. Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2020
    Article
  7. Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2019
    Article
  8. Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2019
    Article
  9. Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2019
    Article
  10. Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R Le FlochService de réanimation chirurgicale et des brûlés PTMC, Nantes, France.
E NauxService de réanimation chirurgicale et des brûlés PTMC, Nantes, France.
J F ArnouldService de réanimation chirurgicale et des brûlés PTMC, Nantes, France.
Imation (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mortality in burn patients is most often caused by infections, which are frequently bacterial. These patients are subject to loss of the cutaneous barrier, invasive devices and immunosuppression which are all contributing factors to the onset of infections. Unfortunately, it is not easy to distinguish general signs of infection from other symptoms associated with burn injuries, making diagnosis difficult. Since infection is a great threat in burns patients, its prevention is a fundamental part of the treatment process. Moreover, due to the anomalous pharmacokinetic characteristics of burns patients, it is also mandatory to adapt any antimicrobial regimen to the outcomes of regular patient blood tests and sampling. At a time when bacterial resistance is becoming an increasing concern, research on alternative treatment (e.g. inhibitors of virulence factors, antimicrobial peptides, polyphenols, immunotherap, and so on) is crucial. One of the more promising possibilities in this area seems to be phagotherapy.

Identifiers

PMID27252607
PMCPMC4837499
OpenAlexW4292679827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.