Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27252578›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of manual & manipulative therapy2016

The effects of neurodynamic straight leg raise treatment duration on range of hip flexion and protective muscle activity at P1.

Ryan Neal Hanney, Colette Ridehalgh, Allan Dawson, Daniel Lewis, Deirdre Kenny

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04652934 (Effectiveness of the Neural Mobilization on Upper Limb Functionality in Patients With Acquired Brain Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04652934 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of the Neural Mobilization on Upper Limb Functionality in Patients With Acquired Brain Injury: Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Centric, Single-Blind Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorVanesa AbuínRan2022 to 2023Enrolled24ConditionsHemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Acquired Brain InjuryArmsNeurodynamic, Mimic group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ryan Neal HanneyUniversity of Brighton, Faculty of Health, School of Health Professions, UK; Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, UK.
Colette RidehalghUniversity of Brighton, Faculty of Health, School of Health Professions, UK.
Allan DawsonUniversity of Brighton, Faculty of Health, School of Health Professions, UK; Beckenham Physiotherapy, Sports and Acupuncture Clinic, UK.
Daniel LewisUniversity of Brighton, Faculty of Health, School of Health Professions, UK; Frimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Deirdre KennyUniversity of Brighton, Faculty of Health, School of Health Professions, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRandomized, single blind, same subject crossover trial.

objectivesTo compare the effects of two neurodynamic treatment doses on range of hip flexion (ROM HF) and electromyographic (EMG) activity of semitendinosus, at first onset of pain (P1).

methodsA total of 26 healthy participants without low back or leg pain received each treatment in a random order with at least 48 hours between sessions. Baseline ROM HF and EMG magnitude of semitendinosus at P1 were collected. Subjects then received either 361 or 362 minutes of oscillating end of range (grade IVz) straight leg raise (SLR) neurodynamic treatment and were re-assessed for baseline measures.

resultsThere was no significant difference between groups in EMG magnitude (P50.190) and ROM HF (P50.739) at P1. There was also no significant difference within groups in EMG magnitude at P1 (P50.182); however, there was a significant improvement in ROM HF at P1 in both groups compared to baseline readings (P50.000), with increases of 6.7u and 5.1u for the 361- and 362-minute groups, respectively.

conclusionFindings indicate that 362 minutes of oscillating grade IVz SLR neurodynamic treatment has no additional benefit over 361 minute, on ROM HF or EMG magnitude of semitendinosus at P1. Using an oscillating SLR treatment may, however, help to increase pain-free ROM HF, although further studies are necessary to confirm this.

Indexed as

Neural mobilizationNeurodynamicsStraight leg raiseTreatment doseTreatment duration

Identifiers

PMID27252578
PMCPMC4870033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.