Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27252397›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2016

Aminoglycosides: An Overview.

Kevin M Krause, Alisa W Serio, Timothy R Kane, Lynn E Connolly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 509 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
509citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

509 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Distinctive Lacritin Cleavage-Potentiated Bactericidal Alteration of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

449 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kevin M KrauseAchaogen, South San Francisco, California 94080.
Alisa W SerioAchaogen, South San Francisco, California 94080.
Timothy R KaneAchaogen, South San Francisco, California 94080.
Lynn E ConnollyAchaogen, South San Francisco, California 94080 Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aminoglycosides are natural or semisynthetic antibiotics derived from actinomycetes. They were among the first antibiotics to be introduced for routine clinical use and several examples have been approved for use in humans. They found widespread use as first-line agents in the early days of antimicrobial chemotherapy, but were eventually replaced in the 1980s with cephalosporins, carbapenems, and fluoroquinolones. Aminoglycosides synergize with a variety of other antibacterial classes, which, in combination with the continued increase in the rise of multidrug-resistant bacteria and the potential to improve the safety and efficacy of the class through optimized dosing regimens, has led to a renewed interest in these broad-spectrum and rapidly bactericidal antibacterials.

Indexed as

AminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug DesignDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID27252397
PMCPMC4888811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.