Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27252396›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2016

Genome Stability Requires p53.

Christine M Eischen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Targeting p53 pathways: mechanisms, structures, and advances in therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Pathophysiology of colitis-associated colorectal cancer.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Double jeopardy: howFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christine M EischenDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37212.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Novel oncogenic functions of Mdm2 and MdmxR01CA181204 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI EISCHEN, CHRISTINE M. · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is now clear that functional p53 is critical to protect the genome from alterations that lead to tumorigenesis. However, with the myriad of cellular stresses and pathways linked to p53 activation, much remains unknown about how p53 maintains genome stability and the proteins involved. The current understanding of the multiple ways p53 contributes to genome stability and how two of its negative regulators, Mdm2 and Mdmx, induce genome instability will be described.

Indexed as

Genomic InstabilityAnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsCell Transformation, NeoplasticDNA DamageGene AmplificationHumansMiceMicroRNAsMutationNuclear ProteinsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Tumor Suppressor Protein p53Cell Cycle ProteinsMDM2 protein, humanMDM4 protein, humanMicroRNAsNuclear ProteinsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID27252396
PMCPMC4888814
OpenAlexW2410798112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.