Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27252264›Full record

ArticleLupus2016

Anti-C1q in systemic lupus erythematosus.

G Stojan, M Petri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lupus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Lupus Nephritis Biomarkers: A Critical Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Circadian rhythms and renal pathophysiology.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Autoimmune diseases - New insights into a troublesome field.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

G StojanDivision of Rheumatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
M PetriDivision of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA mpetri@jhmi.edu.

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (UL1)UL1RR025005 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2007 to 2011
$75.8M
Lupus CohortR01AR043727 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PETRI, MICHELLE A · 1997 to 2015
$8.2M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025005NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR043727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

C1q is the first component of the classical complement pathway. Both clinically validated in-house ELISA assays as well as commercial ELISA kits are used for detection of anti-C1q antibodies. Anti-C1q autoantibodies can be detected in a wide range of autoimmune diseases and are highly sensitive for hypocomplementemic uticarial vasculitis. In SLE, anti-C1q are strongly associated with proliferative lupus nephritis, and their absence carries a negative predictive value for development of lupus nephritis of close to 100%. Anti-C1q in combination with anti-dsDNA and low complement has the strongest serological association with renal involvement. The anti-C1q titers correlate with global disease activity scores in patients with renal involvement, and higher titers seem to precede renal flares. After the successful treatment of a renal flare, anti-C1q has the tendency to decrease or even become undetectable. The main obstacle to the inclusion of anti-C1q in the classification criteria and clinical management of SLE is the lack of standardized laboratory assays.

Indexed as

Antibodies, AntinuclearBiomarkersComplement C1qComplement Pathway, ClassicalHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicLupus NephritisSeverity of Illness IndexAntibodies, AntinuclearBiomarkersComplement C1qanti-C1qC1qlupus nephritisSLESystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID27252264
PMCPMC7523495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.