Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2016
Telehealth for patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: pragmatic randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review of Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring With Support: Intervention Effectiveness and Cost.American journal of preventive medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Mobile phone-based interventions for improving adherence to medication prescribed for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Interventions for improving medication-taking ability and adherence in older adults prescribed multiple medications.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- How Behavior Change Strategies are Used to Design Digital Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence and Blood Pressure Among Patients With Hypertension: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Pooled it
- Mobile phone-based interventions for improving adherence to medication prescribed for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effects of oral probiotic supplements on vaginal microbiota during pregnancy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with microbiome analysis.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Acceptability of Telehealth as the Default Modality for Multiple Sclerosis Care in Switzerland: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Indirect effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiovascular diseases incidence, mortality, and healthcare use among patients with hypertension but without SARS-CoV-2 infection in Hong Kong: an interrupted time series analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Article
- Digital Health in Diabetes Care: A Narrative Review from Monitoring to the Management of Systemic and Neurologic Complications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Establishment of emerging practices and research priorities for telerehabilitation in solid organ transplantation: meeting report and narrative literature review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2025Article
- Post-traumatic growth trajectories and influencing factors in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective longitudinal study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Telehealth-aided outpatient management of acute heart failure in a specialist virtual ward compared with standard care.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Cardiovascular disease risk management during COVID-19: in-person vs virtual visits.The American journal of managed care · 2024Article
- Mobile health for cardiovascular risk management after cardiac surgery: results of a sub-analysis of The Box 2.0 study.European heart journal. Digital health · 2023Article
- Health Techequity: Opportunities for Digital Health Innovations to Improve Equity and Diversity in Cardiovascular Care.Current cardiovascular risk reports · 2023Review
- Telehealth in Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review of the Literature.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2022Article
- Digital health RCT interventions for cardiovascular disease risk reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Health and technology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess whether non-clinical staff can effectively manage people at high risk of cardiovascular disease using digital health technologies.
designPragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
setting42 general practices in three areas of England.
participantsBetween 3 December 2012 and 23 July 2013 we recruited 641 adults aged 40 to 74 years with a 10 year cardiovascular disease risk of 20% or more, no previous cardiovascular event, at least one modifiable risk factor (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg, body mass index ≥30, current smoker), and access to a telephone, the internet, and email. Participants were individually allocated to intervention (n=325) or control (n=316) groups using automated randomisation stratified by site, minimised by practice and baseline risk score.
interventionsIntervention was the Healthlines service (alongside usual care), comprising regular telephone calls from trained lay health advisors following scripts generated by interactive software. Advisors facilitated self management by supporting participants to use online resources to reduce risk factors, and sought to optimise drug use, improve treatment adherence, and encourage healthier lifestyles. The control group comprised usual care alone.
main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the proportion of participants responding to treatment, defined as maintaining or reducing their cardiovascular risk after 12 months. Outcomes were collected six and 12 months after randomisation and analysed masked. Participants were not masked.
results50% (148/295) of participants in the intervention group responded to treatment compared with 43% (124/291) in the control group (adjusted odds ratio 1.3, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 1.9; number needed to treat=13); a difference possibly due to chance (P=0.08). The intervention was associated with reductions in blood pressure (difference in mean systolic -2.7 mm Hg (95% confidence interval -4.7 to -0.6 mm Hg), mean diastolic -2.8 (-4.0 to -1.6 mm Hg); weight -1.0 kg (-1.8 to -0.3 kg), and body mass index -0.4 ( -0.6 to -0.1) but not cholesterol -0.1 (-0.2 to 0.0), smoking status (adjusted odds ratio 0.4, 0.2 to 1.0), or overall cardiovascular risk as a continuous measure (-0.4, -1.2 to 0.3)). The intervention was associated with improvements in diet, physical activity, drug adherence, and satisfaction with access to care, treatment received, and care coordination. One serious related adverse event occurred, when a participant was admitted to hospital with low blood pressure.
conclusionsThis evidence based telehealth approach was associated with small clinical benefits for a minority of people with high cardiovascular risk, and there was no overall improvement in average risk. The Healthlines service was, however, associated with improvements in some risk behaviours, and in perceptions of support and access to care.Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN 27508731.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.