Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27252232›Full record

ReviewBlood2016

Idelalisib in the management of lymphoma.

Chan Yoon Cheah, Nathan H Fowler

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A renaissance in targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. 4(3International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. PI3K Inhibitors in Hematology: When One Door Closes….Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chan Yoon CheahDepartment of Haematology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital and Pathwest Laboratory Medicine, Nedlands, WA, Australia; University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia; and.
Nathan H FowlerThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibition of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway as an anticancer therapeutic strategy was realized with the approval of the orally bioavailable small molecule PI3Kδ inhibitor idelalisib. In this focused review, we highlight the rationale for targeting the pathway in lymphomas, provide a brief summary of the preclinical data, and describe the clinical experience with this agent in patients with lymphoma. We describe some of the idiosyncratic toxicities of this agent, some of the mechanisms of resistance, and some of the ongoing combination strategies.

Indexed as

Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEnzyme InhibitorsHumansLymphomaNeoplasm ProteinsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPurinesQuinazolinonesEnzyme InhibitorsidelalisibNeoplasm ProteinsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsPurinesQuinazolinones

Identifiers

PMID27252232
PMCPMC5161010
OpenAlexW2416458185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.