Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27252218›Full record

ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2016

Photoreception in Phytoplankton.

Nansi Jo Colley, Dan-Eric Nilsson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Algal Ocelloids and Plant Ocelli.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  4. Towards the Idea of Molecular Brains.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Diel transcriptional oscillations of light-sensitive regulatory elements in open-ocean eukaryotic plankton communities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nansi Jo Colley*Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Department of Genetics, McPherson Eye Research Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 53792 WI, USA njcolley@wisc.edu.
Dan-Eric NilssonLund Vision Group, Department of Biology, University of Lund, Lund, SE-221 00, Sweden.
Lund University · SESmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · US

Funding

UW Vision Research Core - Administrative CoreP30EY016665 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ROBERT W NICKELLS · 2005 to 2026
$12.6M
MOLECULAR STUDIES OF RETINAL DEGENERATION IN DROSOPHILAR01EY008768 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI COLLEY, NANSI J. · 1995 to 2016
$5.3M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY016665NEI NIH HHS R01 EY008768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many species of phytoplankton, simple photoreceptors monitor ambient lighting. Photoreceptors provide a number of selective advantages including the ability to assess the time of day for circadian rhythms, seasonal changes, and the detection of excessive light intensities and harmful UV light. Photoreceptors also serve as depth gauges in the water column for behaviors such as diurnal vertical migration. Photoreceptors can be organized together with screening pigment into visible eyespots. In a wide variety of motile phytoplankton, including Chlamydomonas, Volvox, Euglena, and Kryptoperidinium, eyespots are light-sensitive organelles residing within the cell. Eyespots are composed of photoreceptor proteins and typically red to orange carotenoid screening pigments. This association of photosensory pigment with screening pigment allows for detection of light directionality, needed for light-guided behaviors such as positive and negative phototaxis. In Chlamydomonas, the eyespot is located in the chloroplast and Chlamydomonas expresses a number of photosensory pigments including the microbial channelrhodopsins (ChR1 and ChR2). Dinoflagellates are unicellular protists that are ecologically important constituents of the phytoplankton. They display a great deal of diversity in morphology, nutritional modes and symbioses, and can be photosynthetic or heterotrophic, feeding on smaller phytoplankton. Dinoflagellates, such as Kryptoperidinium foliaceum, have eyespots that are used for light-mediated tasks including phototaxis. Dinoflagellates belonging to the family Warnowiaceae have a more elaborate eye. Their eye-organelle, called an ocelloid, is a large, elaborate structure consisting of a focusing lens, highly ordered retinal membranes, and a shield of dark pigment. This complex eye-organelle is similar to multicellular camera eyes, such as our own. Unraveling the molecular makeup, structure and function of dinoflagellate eyes, as well as light-guided behaviors in phytoplankton can inform us about the selective forces that drove evolution in the important steps from light detection to vision. We show here that the evolution from simple photoreception to vision seems to have independently followed identical paths and principles in phytoplankton and animals, significantly strengthening our understanding of this important biological process.

Indexed as

LightAnimalsLocomotionPhytoplanktonUltraviolet Rays

Identifiers

PMID27252218
PMCPMC5895077
OpenAlexW2418003153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.