ReviewClinical medicine (London, England)2016
New approaches to predicting the risk of sudden death.
Review in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Co-expression of calcium and hERG potassium channels reduces the incidence of proarrhythmic events.Cardiovascular research · 2021Pooled it
- Interpretable manifold learning for T-wave alternans assessment with electrocardiographic imaging.Engineering applications of artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Sudden Cardiac Arrest in the Paediatric Population.CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease · 2022Review
- New Approaches in the Management of Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients with Heart Failure-Targeting the Sympathetic Nervous System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Contemporary genetic testing in inherited cardiac disease: tools, ethical issues, and clinical applications.Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this review article, we will explore some of the contemporary methods for predicting sudden cardiac death (SCD). These include experimental methods yet to be adopted in the clinical setting, and methods that have been extrapolated from observational data in those with a history of SCD. We will discuss how these relate to the different aetiologies and disease processes. We will also explore how these may be used in the clinical setting to decide on management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.