Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27251872›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2016

The Experience of Direct Outreach Recruitment in the National Children's Study.

Jill L Kaar, Nina Markovic, Laura B Amsden, Janice Gilliland, Charles F Shorter, Bonika Peters, Nancy M Nachreiner, Mischka Garel, Will Nicholas, Bradley Skarpness and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jill L KaarUniversity of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado; jill.kaar@ucdenver.edu.
Nina MarkovicUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;
Laura B AmsdenNorthwestern University, Evanston, Illinois;
Janice GillilandUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah;
Charles F ShorterTulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana;
Bonika PetersUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota;
Nancy M NachreinerUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota;
Mischka GarelJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland;
Will NicholasUniversity of California, Los Angeles, California;
Bradley SkarpnessBattelle Institute, Atlanta, Georgia; and.
Carolyn Drews-BotschEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Carol J HogueEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Dana DabeleaUniversity of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado;

Funding

NICHD NIH HHS HHSN267200700015CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN267200700017CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN267200700022CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN267200700027CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN267200700029CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275200800004CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275200800010CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275200800018CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275200800024C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFew studies have reported the outcome of direct outreach methods for recruitment of research participants in population-based samples. We describe the relationship of outreach strategies that are tailored to specific community factors to recruitment and consent outcomes in 10 National Children's Study direct outreach study locations (all were single counties).

methodsEach study center collected data from a target population of women who resided in selected county segments that were sampled based on a geographic area probability sampling design. Based on county characteristics of the 10 study locations, each study center used site-specific marketing approaches (direct mail, mass media, provider referrals, social networking) to recruit study participants. Recruitment success was measured by the number of recruited women as well as by a qualitative assessment of the effectiveness of various recruitment methods.

resultsThe number of women who consented varied from 67 to 792. The majority of women were pregnant at the time of consent. Community awareness varied from <1% to 70%. Although no significant associations were found between community characteristics and recruitment success, we found that certain types of outreach strategies enhanced recruitment.

conclusionsIn a small sample of 10 US counties, recruitment success was not associated with community characteristics. It was, however, associated with certain types of outreach strategies that may be more effective in close-knit communities.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentCommunity-Institutional RelationsNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.)Patient SelectionAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicPostal ServicePregnancyUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27251872
PMCPMC4878110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.