Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27251871›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2016

Multilevel Provider-Based Sampling for Recruitment of Pregnant Women and Mother-Newborn Dyads.

Thomas J McLaughlin, Onesky Aupont, Claudia A Kozinetz, David Hubble, Tiffany A Moore-Simas, Deborah Davis, Christina Park, Ruth Brenner, Deidre Sepavich, Marianne Felice and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04919967 (Online Training for Addressing Perinatal Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04919967 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Online Training for Addressing Perinatal Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Massachusetts, WorcesterRan2021 to 2023Enrolled140ConditionsMood Disorders, Anxiety DisordersArmsVirtual implementation protocol, e-learning toolkit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas J McLaughlinUniversity of Massachusetts, Worcester, Massachusetts; thomas.mclaughlin@umassmed.edu.
Onesky AupontUniversity of Massachusetts, Worcester, Massachusetts;
Claudia A KozinetzEast Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee;
David HubbleWestat, Rockville, Maryland;
Tiffany A Moore-SimasUniversity of Massachusetts, Worcester, Massachusetts;
Deborah DavisUniversity of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky;
Christina ParkNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Rockville, Maryland;
Ruth BrennerNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Rockville, Maryland;
Deidre SepavichUniversity of Massachusetts, Worcester, Massachusetts;
Marianne FeliceUniversity of Massachusetts, Worcester, Massachusetts;
Chantal CavinessBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas;
Tim DownsClark University, Worcester, Massachusetts;
Beatrice J SelwynUniversity of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas; and.
Michele R FormanUniversity of Texas, Austin, Texas.
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · USBaylor College of Medicine · USClark University · USEast Tennessee State University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of Louisville · USWestat (United States) · US

Funding

NICHD NIH HHS HHSN267200700024CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275200800020C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn 2010, the National Children's Study launched 3 alternative recruitment methods to test possible improvements in efficiency compared with traditional household-based recruitment and participant enrollment. In 2012, a fourth method, provider-based sampling (PBS), tested a probability-based sampling of prenatal provider locations supplemented by a second cohort of neonates born at a convenience sample of maternity hospitals.

methodsFrom a sampling frame of 472 prenatal care provider locations and 59 maternity hospitals, 49 provider and 7 hospital locations within or just outside 3 counties participated in study recruitment. During first prenatal care visits or immediately postdelivery at these locations, face-to-face contact was used to screen and recruit eligible women.

resultsOf 1450 screened women, 1270 were eligible. Consent rates at prenatal provider locations (62%-74% by county) were similar to those at birth locations (64%-77% by county). During 6 field months, 3 study centers enrolled a total prenatal cohort of 530 women (the majority in the first trimester) and during 2 months enrolled a birth cohort of an additional 320 mother-newborn dyads. As personnel became experienced in the field, the time required to enroll a woman in the prenatal cohort declined from up to 200 hours to 50 to 100 hours per woman recruited.

conclusionsWe demonstrated that PBS was feasible and operationally efficient in recruiting a representative cohort of newborns from 3 diverse US counties. Our findings suggest that PBS is a practical approach to recruit large pregnancy and birth cohorts across the United States.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelMothersNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.)Patient SelectionPregnant PeopleAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicPilot ProjectsPregnancySampling Studies

Identifiers

PMID27251871
PMCPMC4878109
OpenAlexW2418292451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.