Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27251868›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2016

The National Children's Study: Recruitment Outcomes Using an Enhanced Household-Based Approach.

Laura L Blaisdell, Jennifer A Zellner, Alison A King, Elaine Faustman, Mari Wilhelm, Mark L Hudak, Robert D Annett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura L BlaisdellMaine Medical Center, Portland, Maine;
Jennifer A ZellnerUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, California;
Alison A KingWashington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri;
Elaine FaustmanUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington;
Mari WilhelmUniversity of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona;
Mark L HudakUniversity of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida; and.
Robert D AnnettDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi rannett@umc.edu.

Funding

NICHD NIH HHS HHSN267200700021CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN267200700023CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN267200700025CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN267200700031CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN267200700033CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275200800002CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275200800002INICHD NIH HHS HHSN275200800009CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275200800011CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275200800025CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275200800034CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201200013CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201200020C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTen National Children's Study (NCS) study locations with diverse demographic characteristics used an enhanced household-based recruitment (EHBR) approach to enroll preconceptional and pregnant women. Study centers used different types and dosages of community outreach and engagement (COE) activities and supplemental strategies. The goal of the study was to determine whether variability in enumeration and recruitment outcomes correlated with study location characteristics or types and dosages of COE activities (number of COE events, number of advance household mailings, total media expenditures, and total COE expenditures).

methodsEach of the sites provided data on COE activities, protocol implementation, supplemental recruitment activities, location demographic characteristics, and enumeration/recruitment outcomes.

resultsCOE activities varied across sites in breadth and scope. Numerous strategies were used, including media advertising, social media, participation in community-wide events, presentations to stakeholders, and creation of advisory boards. Some sites included supplemental recruitment efforts. EHBR sites enrolled 1404 women at the initial pregnancy screening. No significant relationships were found between study location demographic characteristics or between the types and dosages of COE activities and recruitment outcomes.

conclusionsProbability sampling for a long-term study requires a positive image with stakeholders and within communities; this requirement may be especially true for door-to-door recruitment. EHBR sites successfully recruited a representative sample of preconceptional and pregnant women. Sites reported implementing similar COE activities but with varying dosage and cost; however, analyses did not support a benefit of COE strategies on study recruitment.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentFamily CharacteristicsNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.)Patient SelectionAdolescentAdultChildCommunity-Institutional RelationsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicPregnancySocial MediaUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27251868
PMCPMC4878108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.